Back to skills
extension
Category: Development & EngineeringNo API key required

aico-code-review

Request structured code review to catch correctness, security, performance, and readability issues. Reviews should happen early and often. Use this skill when: - Completing a task and need quality check - After major feature implementation - Before merging to main branch - When stuck and need fresh perspective on code - User asks for "code review", "review my code", "check my code" - Subagent-driven workflow needs spec compliance or quality review Review categories: Correctness, Tests, Security, Performance, Readability, Error Handling Severity levels: Critical (fix now), Important (fix before proceeding), Minor (note for later)

personAuthor: jakexiaohubgithub

Code Review

When to Request Review

Mandatory:

  • After completing each task
  • After implementing major feature
  • Before merge to main

Optional:

  • When stuck (fresh perspective)
  • Before refactoring
  • After fixing complex bug

Review Checklist

| Category | Check | | -------------- | ------------------------------- | | Correctness | Does it do what it should? | | Tests | Are there tests? Do they pass? | | Security | Any vulnerabilities? | | Performance | Any obvious bottlenecks? | | Readability | Is code clear and maintainable? | | Error Handling | Are errors handled properly? |

Issue Severity

| Severity | Action | | ------------- | -------------------------------- | | Critical | Fix immediately, blocks progress | | Important | Fix before proceeding | | Minor | Note for later, can proceed |

Review Output Template

## Code Review: [Feature/Task Name]

### Files Modified

- `path/to/file.ts` - [what changed]

### Issues

**Critical:**

- [ ] [Issue description]

**Important:**

- [ ] [Issue description]

**Minor:**

- [ ] [Issue description]

### Assessment

- [ ] Ready to proceed
- [ ] Needs fixes (see issues above)

Key Rules

  • ALWAYS review after each task completion
  • MUST fix Critical issues immediately
  • MUST fix Important issues before proceeding
  • Minor issues can be noted for later
  • If reviewer is wrong, push back with technical reasoning

Common Mistakes

  • ❌ Skip review because "it's simple" → ✅ Review everything
  • ❌ Ignore Critical issues → ✅ Fix immediately
  • ❌ Proceed with Important issues → ✅ Fix first