Back to skills
extension
Category: Development & EngineeringNo API key required

code-quality-best-practices

Distinguished Engineer-level code quality standards for writing, reviewing, and refactoring code. Use this skill when writing new code, reviewing pull requests, refactoring existing code, designing module boundaries, choosing design patterns, fixing bugs, addressing code smells, or optimizing performance across any programming language.

personAuthor: jakexiaohubgithub

Code Quality Best Practices

Every line of code must satisfy three invariants simultaneously: correctness, clarity, and changeability. They are not in tension — at the DE level, they reinforce each other.

When to Apply

Apply these standards when:

  • Writing any new code or functions
  • Reviewing or refactoring existing code
  • Designing class hierarchies or module boundaries
  • Choosing between design patterns
  • Fixing bugs or addressing code smells
  • Optimizing performance or algorithmic complexity
  • Handling errors or defining failure modes

Three Invariants

Every piece of code must satisfy all three:

  1. Correctness: Does exactly what it claims. Handles every edge case. Fails explicitly when it cannot proceed. Silent failures are bugs.
  2. Clarity: A competent engineer unfamiliar with the codebase can understand intent, contract, and failure modes within 30 seconds.
  3. Changeability: Blast radius of a change is proportional to its semantic scope. One-line requirement changes should be one-line code changes.

Rule Categories by Priority

| Priority | Category | Impact | Prefix | |----------|----------|--------|--------| | 1 | Core Philosophy | CRITICAL | philosophy- | | 2 | Architecture | CRITICAL | arch- | | 3 | Code Quality Standards | CRITICAL | quality- | | 4 | Anti-Patterns | HIGH | anti- | | 5 | Design Patterns | HIGH | pattern- | | 6 | Performance | HIGH | perf- | | 7 | Code Smells | MEDIUM-HIGH | smell- | | 8 | Refactoring | MEDIUM | refactor- |

Core Principles

KISS: Prefer the boring solution that works over the clever solution that impresses. Every abstraction must pay for itself — if it doesn't simplify at least three call sites or eliminate a class of bugs, remove it.

DRY (knowledge, not text): Two identical-looking code blocks that change for different reasons are NOT duplication — they are coincidence. Tolerate duplication until you see it three times.

Parse, don't validate: Push validation to the boundary and produce typed, validated domain objects. Internal code operates on objects that are correct by construction.

Fail fast: Validate preconditions at the top. Return early for error cases. The happy path should be the least-indented path.

How to Use

Read individual reference files for detailed explanations and code examples:

references/philosophy-kiss.md
references/quality-naming.md
references/arch-dependency-inversion.md
references/pattern-selection-heuristic.md
references/_sections.md

Each reference file contains:

  • Brief explanation of the principle and why it matters
  • Incorrect code example with explanation
  • Correct code example with explanation
  • Additional context, edge cases, or trade-offs

Self-Review Checklist

After writing code, verify:

  • Every function does exactly one thing
  • Every name communicates intent
  • No function exceeds 3 parameters
  • Error handling is explicit and typed
  • No dead code or commented-out blocks
  • No premature abstraction (Rule of Three respected)
  • Algorithmic complexity is appropriate
  • Dependencies flow inward (high-level to low-level)
  • The code is testable without mocking frameworks
  • A competent engineer can understand any function in 30 seconds