Content Syndication
Overview
Turn one original content asset (usually a blog article, long-form doc, or X Article) into distinct, channel-native pieces across:
- X posts / X Articles
- LinkedIn posts and LinkedIn articles
- Substack newsletters
- Medium posts
- Optional extras: email newsletter snippet, landing page teaser, etc.
This skill focuses on:
- Preserving the core idea while changing angle, voice, structure, and depth per channel.
- Producing content that feels native to each platform, not copy-pasted.
- Avoiding near-duplicate content that could trigger Google duplicate-content / canonical issues.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- The user has a source piece (blog, deck, memo, X Article, report) and says:
- “Turn this into X + LinkedIn + Substack versions.”
- “Repurpose this blog into posts for different channels.”
- “I want a distribution pack from this article.”
- They want multiple channel outputs from a single asset.
Prefer other skills when:
- They only need a blog from knowledge → use
blog-articles. - They only need a single, high-quality X Article → use
x-articles.
Inputs You Should Collect
Always gather:
-
Source content (canonical piece)
- Paste the full article / doc / notes, or link + pasted key sections.
- Ask which part is most important if it is very long.
-
Target channels
- Explicit list: e.g.,
["X thread", "X Article", "LinkedIn post", "LinkedIn article", "Substack newsletter"]. - If not specified, suggest a default pack and confirm.
- Explicit list: e.g.,
-
Priority goal(s)
- Audience growth (followers/subscribers).
- Lead generation / pipeline.
- Thought leadership / authority.
- Engagement (comments, replies).
-
Audience & positioning
- Primary persona(s) and level.
- Any constraints on brand voice, compliance, or what cannot be said.
If unclear, ask 2–3 sharp questions to resolve ambiguity, not a long survey.
Channels and Native Styles
Use these as default patterns; adjust based on the user’s brand.
X / Twitter
1. X Thread (posts)
- Goal: Fast, snackable, shareable highlights.
- Style:
- 1 high-contrast hook tweet.
- 5–15 follow-up posts, each a complete thought.
- Short lines, clear language, minimal jargon.
- Occasional emojis if on-brand and requested.
- Content:
- Strip most context; highlight key insights, tactics, or “aha” lines.
- Use numbered structure when listing steps.
2. X Article
- Use
x-articlesfor deep optimization when the user wants a full Article. - In this skill, generate an Article-ready draft and note that
x-articlescan further optimize it.
1. LinkedIn Post
- Goal: Professional visibility + conversation.
- Style:
- 3–8 short paragraphs, 1–3 lines each.
- Story or problem setup → 2–4 key insights → CTA/question.
- Light use of bullets; minimal, relevant hashtags (1–5).
- Content:
- Emphasize credibility, context, and people (teams, orgs, leaders).
- Make it easy to comment with an opinion or experience.
2. LinkedIn Article
- Goal: Longer-form professional article that can be referenced.
- Style:
- 800–1,500+ words.
- Clear headings (H2/H3), polished narrative, examples.
- Slightly more formal than a blog if needed, but still human.
Substack Newsletter
- Goal: Deep relationship and recurring engagement.
- Style:
- Conversational, often in the first person.
- Opening that feels like a direct note to the reader.
- Mix of story + analysis + “here’s what to do”.
- Strong CTA to reply, share, or upgrade to paid (if relevant).
- Content:
- More context and reflection.
- One or two personal or behind-the-scenes elements.
Medium Article
- Goal: Broad audience and editorial-style piece.
- Style:
- Strong narrative hook or moment.
- Clear structure, but more literary/conceptual freedom.
- Slightly more polished, less salesy than a company blog.
Anti-Duplicate-Content Rules
To avoid thin or duplicate content across platforms:
-
Change at least two of:
- Angle – who it’s for or what problem you foreground.
- Structure – story-first vs playbook-first vs myth-busting, etc.
- Voice & examples – personal story vs abstract, technical vs plain-language.
-
Rebuild, don’t paraphrase
- Do not just synonym-swap sentences.
- Re-select which stories, examples, or data points you emphasize per channel.
-
Vary intros and closes
- Each channel should have its own hook and own close, not a lightly edited copy.
-
Length adaptation
- Use meaningful compression or expansion:
- X posts: highly compressed.
- LinkedIn / Medium: mid-depth.
- Substack: deepest, with more commentary.
- Use meaningful compression or expansion:
Always include a short “Difference from source” note per channel artifact, explaining:
- What changed (angle, structure, tone).
- Which parts of the original were dropped or added.
Output Structure
For a given input and channel list, output:
-
Syndication summary
- Brief description of the core idea of the source.
- List of target channels.
- 1–2 sentences on global positioning across all channels.
-
Per-channel deliverables
For each channel requested, create a subsection:
Example format (for each channel)
Channel: X Thread
- Hook post
- Thread posts 2–N
- CTA post
- Difference from source
Channel: LinkedIn Post
- Post body (ready to copy-paste).
- Optional bullet list of hashtags.
- Difference from source.
Channel: LinkedIn Article
- Title options (2–3).
- Outline (H2/H3).
- Full draft (if requested) or at least 2–3 representative sections.
- Difference from source.
Channel: Substack Newsletter
- Subject line options.
- Pre-header.
- Newsletter body with intro, main content, CTA.
- Difference from source.
Channel: Medium Article
- Title options.
- Opening section with narrative hook.
- Section overview (H2s).
- Difference from source.
- Implementation notes
- Short guidance on publish order and how to cross-link:
- E.g., “Post the LinkedIn article first, then share the X thread linking to it,” etc.
Detailed Workflow
When this skill triggers, follow these steps:
Step 1 – Digest the source asset
- Read the content once end-to-end.
- Identify:
- Core thesis or message.
- 2–4 strongest insights or frameworks.
- Any standout stories, stats, or lines worth keeping.
Step 2 – Clarify channels and priorities
- Confirm which channels matter most.
- Ask: “If one channel over-performed, which one should it be?” and bias extra care there.
Step 3 – Define per-channel angle
For each channel:
- Decide:
- Who is being spoken to (may differ slightly).
- What problem or aspiration is foregrounded.
- How bold vs safe the tone should be.
- Write 1–2 sentences per channel describing that angle before drafting.
Step 4 – Draft per-channel artifacts
- Start with the highest-priority channel.
- For each:
- Use the native style patterns defined above.
- Respect platform norms (length, cadence, CTA type).
- Ensure the copy can stand on its own if someone never sees the original.
Step 5 – Enforce non-duplication
After drafting:
- For each channel, explicitly check:
- Is the intro clearly differentiated from the source and other channels?
- Are at least some examples, metaphors, or stories unique to this version?
- Is the CTA tuned to platform behavior (reply vs comment vs click vs subscribe)?
- If two versions feel too similar, rewrite one with a new angle or structure.
Step 6 – Summarize and hand off
- Provide a brief publishing plan:
- Suggested order of posting.
- How to link between pieces without sounding spammy.
- Which version should be the canonical source for SEO (usually the main blog or site).
Quality Bar & Checks
Before returning outputs, quickly verify:
-
Channel-native
- Would a heavy user of that platform believe this was written for it, not pasted from somewhere else?
-
Clarity and punch
- Hooks are sharp and specific.
- No platform gets a “watered-down” version; each should have at least one strong idea.
-
SEO safety
- The main canonical article is the deepest, most complete version.
- Other long-form versions (LinkedIn article, Medium) shift angle, examples, and structure enough to avoid being near-clones.
-
Brand consistency
- Voice and POV are consistent across channels, even as style changes.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Copy-pasting paragraphs across platforms with minor rephrasing.
- Using the same intro and CTA in every version.
- Ignoring the behavioral reality of each platform (e.g., X is fast-scan, Substack is long-form relationship building).
- Over-optimizing for SEO at the cost of human engagement on social platforms.
- Forgetting to state which channel is canonical for search engines (assume main site/blog unless told otherwise).
Channel-Specific Patterns & Templates
Use these patterns as starting points, then adapt to the user’s brand and audience.
X Thread Template
Structure (7–12 posts):
-
Hook post
- Format patterns:
- “Most [role] do X. The best do Y instead.”
- “You’re not failing at [topic] because of Z. You’re failing because of A.”
- “We did [specific outcome]. Here’s exactly how.”
- Format patterns:
-
Context (1–2 posts)
- Briefly define the problem or moment that motivated the original piece.
-
Core insights (4–8 posts)
- One insight or tactic per post, often with:
- “Here’s the mistake…”
- “Here’s what to do instead…”
- One insight or tactic per post, often with:
-
Mini-summary (1 post)
- “If you only remember 3 things, remember these: [1/2/3].”
-
CTA (1 post)
- Soft, platform-native ask:
- “If this helped, follow for [cadence + type of content].”
- “Reply with your biggest [topic] mistake and I’ll reply with 1 suggestion.”
- Soft, platform-native ask:
Always:
- Keep lines short and scannable.
- Avoid multi-tweet paragraphs; split long thoughts across posts.
X Article Draft (from Canonical)
When generating an X Article draft inside this skill:
- Shorten intros, cut meta context, and lean into:
- Skimmability (subheadings, bullets, bold).
- Stories and concrete examples.
- Then note that
x-articlescan further:- Run scoring.
- Perform deep rewrite.
- Tighten for X-native reading patterns.
LinkedIn Post Template
Structure:
-
Hook (1–2 short paragraphs)
- Call out a pattern your audience recognizes:
- “Most teams treat performance reviews as a form to fill. That’s why they fail.”
- Call out a pattern your audience recognizes:
-
Body (2–5 paragraphs)
- 1–2 concrete observations.
- 1–2 tactical suggestions or a small framework.
-
CTA / Question
- Invite commentary:
- “How does your team handle X?”
- “What’s one thing you’d change before the next review cycle?”
- Invite commentary:
-
Hashtags (optional)
- 1–5 targeted tags; avoid spammy clouds.
Tone:
- Slightly more professional than X, but still human and opinionated.
LinkedIn Article Template
Structure:
-
Title
- Clear promise about outcome or idea.
-
Intro
- Short scenario or observation grounded in professional context.
-
Main sections (3–5 H2s)
- Problem landscape.
- Your framework or approach.
- 1–2 real examples or mini case studies.
- Implementation checklist or pitfalls.
-
Close
- Takeaways + invite to connect or comment.
Use the canonical blog as:
- Starting skeleton.
- Then adapt:
- Language to be slightly more “boardroom-friendly”.
- Examples to be more org/team-centric vs purely individual.
Substack Newsletter Template
Structure:
-
Subject line
- Lean more personal or story-driven:
- “I almost burned out my entire team.”
- “The performance review mistake I kept repeating.”
- Lean more personal or story-driven:
-
Pre-header
- 1 short line of context or outcome.
-
Intro
- Talk directly to the reader; often first-person.
- Set emotional context: “You probably feel X right now…”
-
Main Content
- Mix of:
- Story (what happened).
- Analysis (what it means).
- Tactics (what to do).
- Mix of:
-
Close
- Reflection.
- CTA to reply with thoughts, share, or upgrade to paid (if applicable).
Substack should feel more intimate than blog or LinkedIn—less polished, more honest.
Medium Article Template
Structure:
-
Narrative Hook
- Begin with a moment, image, or quote.
-
Zoom-Out
- Explain why this moment is representative of a broader pattern.
-
Exploration
- Unpack the idea with:
- Supporting research (if available).
- Examples from industry or culture.
- Unpack the idea with:
-
Resolution
- Land on a clearer way of seeing or approaching the problem.
-
Soft CTA
- Often just an invitation to reflect or follow for more.
Medium rewards story + insight more than raw how-to.
Angle & Differentiation Matrix
To consistently avoid duplication, explicitly choose angle variants.
For each channel, pick at least one:
-
Who’s the hero?
- “You the individual.”
- “You the manager.”
- “The team / org.”
-
Time horizon
- “Fix this today.”
- “Fix this this quarter.”
- “Fix this over the next year.”
-
Frame
- Story (what happened).
- Playbook (how to).
- Opinion (why common practice is wrong).
Example differentiation:
- Canonical blog: “Manager-focused playbook for fixing performance reviews this quarter.”
- X thread: “Checklist of red flags your review process is broken.”
- LinkedIn article: “Org-level risks of bad performance review design.”
- Substack: “Personal story of failing reviews as a manager and how it changed.”
Write this matrix before drafting, then confirm each artifact matches its assigned angle.
Edge Cases & Constraints
Handle these scenarios explicitly:
-
Highly visual original content (slides, dashboards)
- Add descriptions like:
- “[IMAGE: slide 4 of deck—funnel drop-off by stage]”.
- On text-first platforms, describe what the visual shows in 1–2 lines.
- Add descriptions like:
-
Embargoed or confidential information
- Avoid reusing sensitive numbers or internal names.
- Replace specifics with:
- Ranges (“mid-seven figures”).
- Anonymized descriptors (“a European fintech”).
-
Strict legal/compliance environments
- Soften absolute claims (“guarantees”, “will”) into likelihoods.
- Avoid promising specific financial results unless explicitly provided.
-
Very short original piece
- For some channels (e.g., LinkedIn article, Medium), you may need to expand using:
- Supporting context.
- Analogies.
- Industry examples (mark clearly as (opinion) when not from source).
- For some channels (e.g., LinkedIn article, Medium), you may need to expand using:
Example Syndication Flow (Abstracted)
-
Input
- Canonical blog: “If Performance Reviews Are a Surprise, You Failed Months Ago.”
- Goal: attract engineering managers and ICs; grow newsletter + LinkedIn presence.
- Target channels: X thread, LinkedIn post, Substack newsletter.
-
Syndication Summary
- Core idea: performance reviews work only when expectations are set and reinforced all year.
- Channel stack:
- X: fast checklist + teaser.
- LinkedIn: professional framing + org implications.
- Substack: more personal story + behind-the-scenes.
-
Per-channel Artifacts (sketched)
-
X Thread
- Hook: “If your performance reviews are a surprise, you failed months ago.”
- 8–10 posts breaking down red flags + quick fixes.
- CTA: “Follow for more honest engineering management playbooks.”
-
LinkedIn Post
- Story about last-minute review scramble.
- 3 bullets: what great review cycles share.
- Question: “What’s one change that would make your next review cycle less painful?”
-
Substack Newsletter
- Subject: “The year I almost burned out my team with ‘good’ reviews.”
- Body: story + lessons + what changed in their process.
- CTA: reply with their own horror story.
- Differences from Source
- X: stripped context, pure signals and checklists.
- LinkedIn: adds more org-level framing and risk language.
- Substack: much more personal and story-driven.
Interactions with Other Skills
-
When the source is knowledge only (no canonical article yet):
- First use
blog-articlesto create a canonical blog. - Then use
content-syndicationon that canonical asset.
- First use
-
When the user wants a hero X Article as the main long-form:
- Use
x-articlesto create and optimize the X Article. - Then use
content-syndicationto generate:- X thread teasing the Article.
- LinkedIn / Substack / Medium versions adapted from either the X Article or the canonical blog, depending on strategy.
- Use
-
When the user wants to turn syndicated posts into conversation or outreach:
- Use
linkedin-engagementfor LinkedIn comments and DMs. - Use
x-engagementfor X replies, quote posts, and DMs.
- Use
Scan to join WeChat group