Contract Analysis

Extracts and evaluates material provisions, risk allocations, and obligations across one or more contracts to support negotiation, execution, or remediation decisions.

Prerequisites

Before starting, collect:

1. Contract document(s) — executed or draft; note which
2. Client role — which party the analysis favors (or neutral)
3. Jurisdiction — governing law if known; flag if absent
4. Scope — full review, specific provisions, or multi-contract comparison

Workflow

1. Executive Summary

• Parties, effective date, term, governing law (1–2 sentences each)
• Top 3–5 critical risks requiring immediate attention
• Overall favorability: favorable / balanced / unfavorable

2. Key Provisions Matrix

For each provision, record section number, summary, risk level (High/Med/Low), and notes.

Provisions to evaluate:

• Term & Termination — cure periods, notice, convenience rights
• Payment Terms — timing, late fees, set-off rights
• Scope / Deliverables — ambiguity, change-order mechanics
• Indemnification — mutual vs. one-sided, carve-outs
• Limitation of Liability — cap amount, excluded damages
• Warranty / Disclaimer — express vs. implied, remedy limits
• Insurance — required types, minimums
• IP Ownership — work-for-hire, license-back, background IP
• Confidentiality — term, carve-outs, residuals clause
• Dispute Resolution — arb vs. litigation, venue, fee-shifting
• Auto-Renewal — notice window, opt-out mechanics
• Assignment / Change of Control — consent requirements
• Force Majeure — scope, notice, extended FM termination right
• Governing Law / Venue

3. Risk Matrix

For each issue found, record section, severity, likelihood, and recommended action.

Risk categories:

• Ambiguity — language supporting multiple interpretations
• Asymmetry — one-sided obligations or liability allocation
• Gaps — material matters left unaddressed
• Conflicts — internal inconsistencies between sections
• Unenforceability — provisions likely void under applicable law

4. Comparative Analysis (multi-contract only)

Table comparing key terms across agreements; flag deviations from market standard.

5. Prioritized Recommendations

Rank issues by priority (Critical → High → Moderate) with provision reference, issue description, and proposed fix for each.

Checks

• Cite exact section numbers and quote key language verbatim
• Flag auto-renewal clauses with short opt-out windows as high-priority regardless of other factors
• Note all cross-references to external documents, exhibits, or incorporated standards — treat as additional obligations
• For ambiguous provisions, state the full range of plausible interpretations and implications
• Mark [VERIFY] on any statutory or case citations — do not assess enforceability under specific state law without verifying current precedent
• UCC Article 2 applies to goods; common law governs services — note if contract mixes both without specifying
• Flag non-compete, non-solicit, and liquidated damages clauses for separate enforceability review under applicable state law