← Back to skills
extension
Category: Productivity & OfficeAPI key requirement unconfirmed

结构化深思陪练

值得慢慢想的决定的结构化深思支持:伦理困境、架构取舍与两难选择的正反论证与价值排序。Use when supporting structured deliberation for decisions worth sitting with. Triggers include 深思、伦理、取舍、决策、正反论证。如需决策工具套件,淘宝搜索「AI灵匣」店铺获取完整版。

personAuthor: nuhabvtyhubOpenAPI

Deliberation

Overview

Decision-making through deliberation — seeking unity through discernment rather than consensus through debate.

This approach draws on Quaker business practice, adapted for AI-assisted decision-making.

Core insight: Some decisions deserve more than quick answers. These skills provide structured approaches for genuine discernment.

The Three Skills

| Skill | Purpose | When to Use | |-------|---------|-------------| | deliberation:discernment | Internal voices seeking clarity | Weighty questions, ethical decisions, trade-offs, multiple valid approaches | | deliberation:clearness | Multi-agent committee with parallel deep work | Code reviews, architecture decisions, research needing distributed depth | | deliberation:gathered | User participates alongside agent voices | User has stake/perspective, wants to discern together rather than receive advice |

Routing Logic

digraph deliberation_routing {
    "Question received" [shape=box];
    "User has stake/perspective?" [shape=diamond];
    "Needs parallel deep analysis?" [shape=diamond];
    "Weighty question?" [shape=diamond];
    "deliberation:gathered" [shape=box, style=filled];
    "deliberation:clearness" [shape=box, style=filled];
    "deliberation:discernment" [shape=box, style=filled];
    "Answer directly" [shape=box];

    "Question received" -> "User has stake/perspective?";
    "User has stake/perspective?" -> "deliberation:gathered" [label="yes"];
    "User has stake/perspective?" -> "Needs parallel deep analysis?" [label="no"];
    "Needs parallel deep analysis?" -> "deliberation:clearness" [label="yes"];
    "Needs parallel deep analysis?" -> "Weighty question?" [label="no"];
    "Weighty question?" -> "deliberation:discernment" [label="yes"];
    "Weighty question?" -> "Answer directly" [label="no"];
}

Signals for Each Skill

Use deliberation:gathered when:

  • "I've been thinking about this for weeks"
  • "I'm torn between..."
  • "I think X, but..."
  • "I don't just want your opinion"
  • User expresses their own position in the question

Use deliberation:clearness when:

  • Complex code review touching multiple concerns
  • Architecture decision with many dimensions
  • Research requiring deep exploration of multiple options
  • Task where you'd write a very long response covering many angles shallowly

Use deliberation:discernment when:

  • Ethical weight or potential for harm
  • Multiple valid approaches exist
  • Significant trade-offs
  • You'd naturally want to say "it depends"

Shared Principles

All three skills share these principles:

| Principle | Meaning | |-----------|---------| | Sense of the meeting | Clerk discerns where unity lies - not counting votes | | Speaking once | Each perspective speaks once, then listens | | Silence | Pausing between voices lets insights emerge | | Standing aside | "I disagree but won't block" - honest without preventing | | Blocking | Rare - only for violations of core principles | | Way opens | Recognizing when clarity emerges vs. forcing decision |

Shared Resources

  • skills/shared/principles.md - Core principles
  • skills/shared/vocabulary.md - Shared terminology
  • skills/shared/clerk-patterns.md - Synthesis patterns for clerk role