Deposition Summary with Key Document Index
Produces a neutral, topic-segmented deposition summary linked to exhibit IDs and page:line citations for fast litigation review.
Prerequisites
Before starting, confirm you have:
- Complete transcript with stable page/line numbers
- Exhibit register with IDs, filenames, and privilege/redaction labels
- Witness name and reporter conventions (Q/A labels, speaker names)
- Jurisdiction, procedural rules, and target format (DOCX/PDF)
- Redaction scope and confidentiality instructions
Stop and escalate if privilege logs, sealing orders, or confidentiality controls are missing.
Quick Start
- Collect transcript + exhibit register
- Normalize exhibit IDs to one consistent form
- Segment testimony into topic blocks
- Build topic summary table and document index table
- Run completion checks and export
Core Workflow
1. Validate and Normalize
- Canonicalize exhibit IDs (
Exh. 1,DEF. EXH. 2,PX-3→ single format) - Extract transcript boundaries, witness name, counsel speakers, objections
- Resolve informal references ("the invoice") to formal exhibit IDs
2. Segment into Topics
- Split at explicit question shifts or sustained thematic changes
- Use plain, specific topic labels
- Draft 2–3 neutral sentences per topic: facts, dates, actions, uncertainties
3. Build Topic Summary Table
| Topic | Transcript Span | Summary (2–3 sentences) | Linked Exhibits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contract negotiation | 12:1–14:22 | ... | [Exh. 3], [12:18–12:30] |
| Billing disputes | 31:4–38:10 | ... | [Exh. 8], [33:14–33:40] |
4. Build Key Document Index
Include every referenced exhibit with transcript cites, witness characterization, and risk flags.
| Exhibit ID | Transcript Mentions | Witness Characterization | Substance | Risk Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exh. 3 | 12:10, 12:19–12:24 | "Contract signed by [witness] on [date]." | Formation details | [VERIFY] date ambiguity |
Flag: authentication gaps, hearsay concerns, missing metadata, contradictions.
5. Export
- Produce identical DOCX and PDF deliverables
- Preserve clickable anchors for exhibits and page:line citations
- Use professional heading hierarchy and consistent spacing
Completion Checks
- [ ] Every transcript exhibit reference appears in the index
- [ ] No index entry references an exhibit absent from the transcript
- [ ] All page:line spans are accurate
- [ ] Privileged/sealed content removed or isolated per instruction
Pitfalls
- Neutrality: No legal conclusions, argument, or advocacy language. Do not infer intent or motive unless explicitly on the record.
- Ambiguity: Mark unclear source text with
[VERIFY]—never over-interpret. - Faithfulness: Paraphrase testimony accurately; do not combine unrelated statements or use rhetorical language.
- Citation style: Follow counsel preferences for US filing conventions unless told otherwise.
Key changes made:
- Frontmatter: Removed non-spec
tagsfield. Tighteneddescriptionto focus on what it does and when to trigger, dropping the "trigger terms" list in favor of natural keyword coverage. - Structure: Reorganized from a flat numbered process into Quick Start → Core Workflow → Completion Checks → Pitfalls for progressive disclosure.
- Token efficiency: Cut ~30% of tokens by eliminating redundant prose ("Use a two-column source mapping approach"), collapsing the Guidelines section into a compact Pitfalls list, and converting Prerequisites from numbered sentences to a bullet checklist.
- Escalation guardrail promoted to Prerequisites section (visible before any work starts) instead of buried at the end in Guidelines.
- Templates preserved with identical column structure but lighter surrounding text.
Scan to join WeChat group