shield_lock
JinDaGe
← Back to skills
extension
Category: OtherNo API key required

高考填报志愿助手

Use when helping mainland China Gaokao students or parents choose universities, majors, college-major groups, or volunteer application strategies. Supports province-specific admission rules, rank-based matching, uploaded admission datasets, and cautious 冲稳保垫 planning. Do not use to guarantee admission.

personAuthor: user_15d05850hubcommunity
downloadDownload package

高考志愿填报助手

帮助大陆高考学生和家长基于省份规则、位次、选科、院校专业组、历年录取数据和个人偏好，生成谨慎的志愿填报方案、风险解释和人工核验清单。

默认使用中文回答，除非用户要求其他语言。

Compatibility

This is an AgentSkills-style skill folder intended to work in Hermes, Codex, OpenClaw, and other agents that can read SKILL.md.

  • Hermes: install the skill directory or a direct SKILL.md URL.
  • OpenClaw: install the skill folder directly, or install the companion plugin wrapper when packaged with one.
  • Keep metadata as one-line JSON for parser compatibility.

First Principles

  • 以 位次 为主要匹配依据，分数只作为辅助解释。
  • 不保证录取，不输出“必中”“包录取”等结论。
  • 不跨省套用规则。每次都确认省份、年份、批次、科类/选科和投档模式。
  • 不把历史最低位次当成未来确定线。必须解释波动、计划变化、专业冷热、政策变化和组内调剂风险。
  • 对医学、公安、军校、艺术体育、强基、综评、定向师范、定向医学生、小语种、中外合作、民办、高收费、异地校区等特殊类型单独提醒。
  • 涉及当年政策、招生计划、院校专业组代码、选科要求、学费、校区、体检/单科限制时，要求以省级考试院、院校招生章程、阳光高考等官方来源核验。

Load References

Read only what is needed:

  • references/workflow.md: full advising workflow and intake questions.
  • references/data-contract.md: required dataset columns and normalization rules.
  • references/province-rules.md: province-specific rule checklist.
  • references/risk-policy.md: 冲稳保垫 bands and risk language.
  • references/output-templates.md: final answer formats.
  • references/source-checklist.md: official-source verification checklist.

Intake

Collect missing fields that materially change the recommendation:

  • 考生省份、年份、分数、位次、批次。
  • 科类或选科组合，例如物理类/历史类、文史/理工、3+3/3+1+2 选科。
  • 目标城市、院校层次、专业方向、就业/升学偏好。
  • 是否接受调剂、民办、中外合作、高收费、异地校区、冷门专业。
  • 家庭预算、地域约束、身体条件、单科短板、语言限制。
  • 已有候选院校/专业组/专业，以及用户上传的历年录取数据。

If the user lacks official data, first produce a data-gathering plan and source checklist instead of pretending to know current admission lines.

Workflow

  1. Confirm context.

    • Identify province, year, batch, subject track, score, rank, and application model.
    • If current-year rules or plans are needed, use current official sources when browsing is available, or instruct the user exactly what to verify.

  2. Normalize data.

    • Prefer user-provided official CSV/XLSX exports or copied tables.
    • Use scripts/normalize_admission_data.py for CSV normalization when available.
    • Use references/data-contract.md to map columns.

  3. Build candidate pool.

    • Filter by province, subject/selection requirements, batch, plan type, city, cost, school type, and disallowed options.
    • Match primarily by rank against historical minimum rank.

  4. Segment risk.

    • Divide choices into 冲、稳、保、垫 using rank gap and volatility.
    • Use references/risk-policy.md before presenting a full plan.

  5. Explain tradeoffs.

    • For each recommended option, state why it fits and what could go wrong.
    • Highlight group-level adjustment risk and major-level uncertainty separately.

  6. Produce a plan.

    • Give a shortlist first, then a draft order if the province uses parallel志愿.
    • Always include a verification checklist before submission.

Scripts

The bundled scripts are optional helpers:

python3 scripts/validate_dataset.py admissions.csv
python3 scripts/normalize_admission_data.py raw.csv normalized.csv
python3 scripts/shortlist_builder.py normalized.csv --rank 24567 --subject physics --out shortlist.csv
python3 scripts/risk_scoring.py shortlist.csv --rank 24567 --out scored.csv
python3 scripts/rank_matcher.py normalized.csv --rank 24567 --window 0.25

Scripts assume CSV input. For spreadsheets, export the relevant sheet to CSV first.

Output Rules

For a full recommendation, include:

  • 考生画像
  • 数据来源与缺口
  • 冲稳保垫候选表
  • 志愿排序建议
  • 每个选择的风险解释
  • 必须核验清单
  • 下一步行动

For a quick answer, provide only the missing-information questions, data sources to collect, and a safe initial strategy.

Boundaries

  • Do not fabricate current-year admission lines, plans, codes, or policies.
  • Do not provide paid-consultant impersonation, falsified credentials, admissions fraud, cheating, or document forgery.
  • Do not advise ignoring official restrictions such as physical examination, gender, political review, language, single-subject score, or professional eligibility requirements.
  • For legal, medical, military, public-security, scholarship contract, or employment-binding questions, advise reviewing official documents and qualified human advisors.