Managing Counterparty Risk
When To Use
- Onboarding a new derivatives, lending, or repo counterparty and setting initial credit limits
- Periodic (quarterly/annual) review of existing counterparty exposures against approved limits
- Calculating potential future exposure (PFE) or credit valuation adjustment (CVA) for a portfolio
- Evaluating collateral adequacy after a credit event, rating downgrade, or material market move
- Preparing counterparty risk reports for risk committees, regulators, or senior management
- Assessing netting and close-out enforceability under ISDA or equivalent master agreements
Inputs To Gather
- Counterparty profile: Legal entity name, LEI, corporate structure, domicile, sovereign rating
- Credit assessment data: External ratings (S&P, Moody's, Fitch), internal scorecard results, CDS spreads, financial statements (most recent 2-3 periods)
- Exposure data: Trade-level mark-to-market by product (derivatives, repo, securities lending, loans), notional amounts, maturity profiles
- Netting & collateral documentation: ISDA master agreement status, CSA/VM-CSA terms (thresholds, minimum transfer amounts, eligible collateral, haircuts), netting opinion coverage [VERIFY jurisdiction-specific enforceability]
- Limit framework: Approved credit limits by exposure type (current exposure, PFE, settlement risk), tenor buckets, and any sub-limits by product or desk
- Regulatory parameters: SA-CCR or IMM methodology inputs, risk weights, CVA capital charge requirements [VERIFY applicable framework: Basel III / Basel IV / local implementation]
Workflow
-
Profile the counterparty
- Confirm legal entity, group hierarchy, and ultimate parent
- Map to internal rating grade using scorecard or external rating mapping
- Determine probability of default (PD) and loss given default (LGD) assumptions
- Flag any wrong-way risk — correlation between counterparty creditworthiness and exposure direction
-
Calculate exposure metrics
- Compute current exposure (CE): aggregate positive MTM after legally enforceable netting
- Estimate potential future exposure (PFE) at defined confidence interval (typically 95th or 97.5th percentile) across relevant time horizons (1-day, 10-day, 1-year, life-of-trade)
- Derive expected exposure (EE) and expected positive exposure (EPE) profiles for CVA pricing
- For SA-CCR: compute replacement cost (RC) and PFE add-on by asset class (interest rate, FX, credit, equity, commodity) [VERIFY regulatory multipliers and supervisory factors]
-
Assess collateral and mitigation
- Verify CSA terms: threshold, independent amount, minimum transfer amount, frequency of margin calls
- Calculate net unsecured exposure after applying collateral (cash, government bonds, other eligible assets with appropriate haircuts)
- Review initial margin (IM) adequacy for cleared vs. bilateral trades
- Evaluate guarantees, credit insurance, or CDS hedges and their effectiveness
- Confirm netting opinion validity for counterparty jurisdiction [VERIFY local netting enforceability]
-
Test against limits and triggers
- Compare CE, PFE, and settlement exposure against approved counterparty limits
- Identify limit breaches, near-breaches (e.g., >80% utilization), and tenor concentrations
- Check for credit event triggers: rating downgrade clauses, additional termination events (ATEs), cross-default provisions
- Run stress scenarios: counterparty default under adverse market conditions, jump-to-default, simultaneous collateral devaluation
-
Compile risk report and recommendations
- Summarize exposure profile with trend analysis (current vs. prior period)
- Present limit utilization dashboard by counterparty, product, and tenor
- Highlight watch-list counterparties and escalation items
- Recommend actions: limit adjustments, additional collateral calls, trade compression or novation, hedging via CDS
Output
The counterparty risk report should contain:
- Executive summary: Top 10 exposures, aggregate portfolio PFE, notable changes since last review
- Individual counterparty cards: Rating, PD/LGD, CE/PFE, limit utilization, collateral coverage ratio, wrong-way risk flag
- Exposure analytics: Breakdown by asset class, maturity bucket, and netting set; concentration metrics (Herfindahl index or top-N share)
- Stress test results: Impact of defined scenarios on exposure and collateral values
- Action items: Specific limit changes, margin call recommendations, documentation remediation (e.g., outstanding netting opinions or CSA amendments)
- Regulatory capital impact: SA-CCR EAD or IMM exposure, CVA capital charge delta [VERIFY capital framework in effect]
Quality Checks
- Verify that netting is applied only where a valid, current netting opinion exists for the relevant jurisdiction
- Confirm PFE model parameters (volatilities, correlations, confidence level) are consistent with approved methodology
- Cross-check MTM values against independent valuation sources (front-office vs. risk system reconciliation)
- Ensure haircuts on collateral reflect current market conditions and regulatory minimums
- Validate that wrong-way risk exposures are separately identified and not netted against general exposure
- Confirm all limit breaches have documented escalation and remediation timelines
- Check that rating downgrade trigger analysis reflects current CSA/ISDA terms, not stale documentation
Scan to join WeChat group