Back to skills
extension
Category: Productivity & OfficeNo API key required

managing-eu-taxonomy-compliance

Structures EU Taxonomy alignment assessment with technical screening criteria and DNSH evaluation. Use when assessing Taxonomy alignment, applying technical criteria, or evaluating substantial contribution.

personAuthor: jakexiaohubgithub

Managing EU Taxonomy Compliance

When To Use

  • Assessing whether an economic activity qualifies as Taxonomy-aligned under the EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852)
  • Evaluating substantial contribution to one or more of the six environmental objectives
  • Applying Technical Screening Criteria (TSC) from the Climate Delegated Act or Environmental Delegated Act
  • Conducting Do No Significant Harm (DNSH) analysis across non-target objectives
  • Preparing Taxonomy alignment disclosures for SFDR Article 8/9 funds or CSRD/NFRD corporate reporting
  • Reviewing Taxonomy eligibility vs. alignment distinctions for portfolio or entity-level reporting

Inputs To Gather

  • Activity description: NACE code(s), revenue segments, and capex/opex breakdown for the economic activity under review
  • Environmental objective: Which of the six objectives is claimed for substantial contribution (climate mitigation, climate adaptation, water, circular economy, pollution prevention, biodiversity) [VERIFY which Delegated Act applies]
  • Technical data: Emissions intensity, energy performance certificates, resource consumption metrics, or other quantitative thresholds relevant to the applicable TSC
  • DNSH evidence: Documentation or data addressing each of the remaining five objectives (e.g., climate risk assessments for adaptation DNSH, water management plans, waste hierarchy compliance)
  • Minimum safeguards: Confirmation of alignment with OECD Guidelines, UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO core conventions, and the International Bill of Human Rights
  • Reporting context: Whether disclosure is for fund-level (SFDR PAI/periodic reporting), corporate-level (CSRD/NFRD), or investor due diligence purposes

Workflow

  1. Determine Taxonomy eligibility

    • Map the economic activity to the relevant NACE sector and Taxonomy activity description
    • Confirm the activity appears in the applicable Delegated Act (Climate or Environmental)
    • Distinguish between eligibility (activity is listed) and alignment (activity meets all criteria)
  2. Identify the target environmental objective

    • Select the primary objective to which the activity claims substantial contribution
    • An activity can only count toward one objective to avoid double-counting in KPI calculations
    • Pull the specific TSC thresholds from the relevant Delegated Act annex [VERIFY current thresholds — these are periodically updated by the European Commission]
  3. Assess substantial contribution

    • Compare the activity's quantitative performance against each TSC threshold (e.g., <100g CO2e/kWh for electricity generation under climate mitigation)
    • For transitional activities, verify the activity meets the "best available technology" or "lock-in avoidance" criteria
    • For enabling activities, confirm the activity enables substantial contribution in another activity without leading to lock-in of carbon-intensive assets
    • Document data sources, measurement methodologies, and any estimation approaches used
  4. Conduct DNSH assessment across remaining objectives

    • For each non-target objective, apply the corresponding DNSH criteria from the Delegated Act:
      • Climate adaptation: Climate risk and vulnerability assessment conducted per Appendix A methodology
      • Climate mitigation: No significant GHG increase from the activity
      • Water: Environmental degradation risks addressed per Water Framework Directive requirements
      • Circular economy: Waste management aligned with waste hierarchy principles
      • Pollution prevention: Activity does not increase pollutant emissions beyond regulatory limits
      • Biodiversity: Environmental Impact Assessment completed where required; no degradation of protected areas
    • Flag any DNSH criterion lacking sufficient evidence as [VERIFY]
  5. Verify minimum safeguards compliance

    • Confirm the entity has due diligence procedures aligned with OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises
    • Check for grievance mechanisms consistent with UN Guiding Principles
    • Review for adverse human rights, labor, anti-corruption, or tax findings [VERIFY against entity's public disclosures and controversy screening]
  6. Calculate and report Taxonomy KPIs

    • Compute Taxonomy-aligned revenue, capex, and opex ratios as applicable
    • For fund-level: aggregate across portfolio holdings weighted by investment proportion
    • For corporate-level: segment by activity and present numerator/denominator breakdowns
    • Apply the mandatory reporting templates per the Disclosures Delegated Act (Annex tables)
  7. Document gaps and escalation items

    • List any TSC or DNSH criteria where data is insufficient or methodology is uncertain
    • Flag activities near threshold boundaries that may shift with updated data
    • Identify where third-party verification or assurance is required [VERIFY — limited vs. reasonable assurance requirements vary by reporting framework]

Output

  • Taxonomy Alignment Assessment Report containing:
    • Activity-by-activity eligibility and alignment determination
    • Substantial contribution analysis with data points mapped to TSC thresholds
    • DNSH evaluation matrix (pass/fail/insufficient data per objective)
    • Minimum safeguards compliance summary
    • Taxonomy-aligned KPIs (revenue %, capex %, opex %) with calculation methodology
    • Gap register with recommended remediation actions and data collection priorities
    • Disclosure-ready tables formatted per applicable reporting templates

Quality Checks

  • Every TSC threshold cited is cross-referenced against the current Delegated Act text [VERIFY — Delegated Acts are subject to amendment]
  • DNSH analysis covers all five non-target objectives without omission
  • Minimum safeguards assessment addresses all four pillars (human rights, labor, corruption, taxation)
  • Eligibility and alignment are clearly distinguished — no eligible-but-unaligned activity is reported as aligned
  • KPI calculations use consistent denominators and avoid double-counting across objectives
  • All data gaps and estimation methods are transparently disclosed with [VERIFY] markers
  • Output references the correct reporting framework (SFDR RTS, CSRD/ESRS, NFRD) for the intended audience