shield_lock
JinDaGe
← Back to skills
extension
Category: Content & MediaNo API key required

massgen

Invoke MassGen's multi-agent system for general-purpose tasks, evaluation, planning, or spec writing. Use whenever you want multiple AI agents to tackle a problem, need outside perspective on your work, a thoroughly refined plan, or a well-specified set of requirements. Perfect for: writing, code generation, research, design, analysis, pre-PR review, complex project planning, feature specification, architecture decisions, or any task where multi-agent iteration produces better results than working alone.

personAuthor: jakexiaohubgithub
open_in_newRepositorydownloadDownload package

MassGen

Invoke MassGen for multi-agent iteration on any task — general-purpose work, evaluation, planning, or spec writing. Multiple AI agents independently work on the problem and converge on the strongest result through MassGen's checklist-gated voting system.

When to Use

General (default) — get multi-agent results on any task:

  • When you want multiple AI agents to independently tackle a problem
  • When the task doesn't fit neatly into evaluate, plan, or spec
  • Writing, research, code generation, design, analysis, or any open-ended task

Evaluate — get diverse, critical feedback on existing work:

  • After iterating and stalling — need outside perspective
  • Before submitting PRs or delivering artifacts
  • When wanting diverse AI perspectives on implementation quality

Plan — create or refine a structured project plan:

  • When starting a complex feature or project that needs task decomposition
  • When an existing plan has gaps, is too vague, or needs restructuring
  • When you need a valid task DAG with verification criteria

Spec — create or refine a requirements specification:

  • When starting a feature that needs precise requirements before implementation
  • When an existing spec has ambiguities, missing edge cases, or gaps
  • When you need EARS-formatted requirements with acceptance criteria

Mode Selection

| Mode | Purpose | Input | Output | Default Criteria Preset | |------|---------|-------|--------|------------------------| | general | Any task | Task description + context | Winner's deliverables in result.md + workspace files | Auto-generated | | evaluate | Critique existing work | Artifacts to evaluate | critique_packet.md (with approach_assessment), verdict.json, next_tasks.json (with fix_tasks, evolution_tasks) | "evaluation" | | plan | Create or refine a plan | Goal + constraints (+ existing plan) | project_plan.json (typed tasks, chunks, deps, prototypes) | "planning" | | spec | Create or refine a spec | Problem + needs (+ existing spec) | project_spec.json (EARS requirements, chunks, rationale) | "spec" |

FIRST: Check Config (do this before anything else)

Before reading any other section of this skill, run this check:

ls .massgen/config.yaml 2>/dev/null && echo "FOUND: project config"
ls ~/.config/massgen/config.yaml 2>/dev/null && echo "FOUND: global config"
  • If the user gave a specific config path → use it with --config <path>.
  • If .massgen/config.yaml exists → use it (no --config needed).
  • If ~/.config/massgen/config.yaml exists → use it.
  • If neither exists → run the web quickstart from the current working directory (do NOT cd anywhere) and wait for it to finish:
uv run massgen --web-quickstart

Run this from cwd so the config is saved to .massgen/config.yaml in the right project. Do NOT cd to another directory first. The quickstart opens a browser where the user picks providers/models, enters API keys, and saves a config. It exits automatically when done.

STOP here until you have a config. Do NOT proceed with the workflow below until a config exists. Do NOT create config files yourself. Do NOT search for configs in subdirectories, parent directories, or anywhere else.

Scope

Before starting, determine what the MassGen invocation covers. Focused invocations produce far better results than unscoped "do everything" runs.

  • General: the task to accomplish, relevant context, quality expectations
  • Evaluate: which files/artifacts to evaluate, what to ignore, evaluation focus
  • Plan: the goal/objective, constraints, what context to include
  • Spec: the problem to specify, user needs, system boundaries

If the user doesn't specify scope, ask them.

Workflow

Step 0: Create Working Directory

Create a timestamped subdirectory so parallel invocations don't conflict:

MODE="general"  # or "evaluate", "plan", or "spec"
WORK_DIR=".massgen/$MODE/$(date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S)"
mkdir -p "$WORK_DIR"

All artifacts (context, criteria, prompt, output, logs) go in this directory.

Step 1: Clarify & Write Context File

Read references/<mode>/workflow.md (relative to this skill) for the context file template specific to your mode.

Write $WORK_DIR/context.md using the template from the workflow file.

Key principle for all modes: provide factual context that orients the MassGen agents. Do NOT bias them with your opinions about quality — let them discover issues independently. That's the whole point of multi-agent evaluation.

  • General: describe the task, relevant context, quality expectations
  • Evaluate: describe what was built, scope, git info, verification evidence
  • Plan: describe the goal, constraints, existing context, success criteria
  • Spec: describe the problem, user needs, system boundaries, constraints

Step 2: Generate Criteria

Each mode has a recommended criteria preset:

| Mode | Preset | How to Apply | |------|--------|-------------| | general | Auto-generated | Omit --criteria-file and --criteria-preset | | evaluate | Custom or "evaluation" | --criteria-file with JSON, or --criteria-preset evaluation | | plan | "planning" | --criteria-preset planning | | spec | "spec" | --criteria-preset spec |

For general mode, criteria are auto-generated from the task content — omit both flags unless you have specific quality axes to enforce.

To use custom criteria: read references/criteria_guide.md for the format and writing guide, then write criteria JSON to $WORK_DIR/criteria.json.

If there's a specific focus area, weight your criteria toward that focus. In Claude Code: use AskUserQuestion to ask the user for focus preference. In Codex or non-interactive: default to general coverage.

cat > $WORK_DIR/criteria.json << 'EOF'
[
  {"text": "...", "category": "must"},
  {"text": "...", "category": "must"},
  {"text": "...", "category": "should"},
  {"text": "...", "category": "could"}
]
EOF

Step 3: Construct the Prompt

  1. Read the prompt template from references/<mode>/prompt_template.md (relative to this skill)
  2. Read the context file you wrote in Step 1
  3. Replace {{CONTEXT_FILE_CONTENT}} with the context file contents
  4. Replace {{CUSTOM_FOCUS}} with the focus directive (or empty string if none)
  5. Write the final prompt to $WORK_DIR/prompt.md

Step 4: Run MassGen

Use the launcher script (scripts/massgen_run.sh relative to this skill) to run MassGen, launch the web viewer, and wait for completion in a single atomic command. This avoids the double-backgrounding issues that cause agents to lose track of running processes.

Run in the background using your agent's native mechanism (e.g., run_in_background in Claude Code):

# SKILL_DIR is the directory containing this SKILL.md file
bash "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/massgen_run.sh" \
  --work-dir "$WORK_DIR" \
  --prompt-file "$WORK_DIR/prompt.md" \
  --criteria-file "$WORK_DIR/criteria.json" \
  --viewer

If using default criteria (no custom criteria file), omit --criteria-file. For planning/spec modes, use --criteria-preset planning or --criteria-preset spec instead. If you resolved a custom config in Step 2, add --config <path>.

The script handles everything atomically:

  1. Launches MassGen in --automation mode
  2. Waits for the log directory to appear (with 30s timeout)
  3. Starts the web viewer at http://localhost:8000
  4. Waits for MassGen to complete
  5. Writes $WORK_DIR/run_summary.json with exit code, duration, log dir

After the background task completes, read the summary:

cat $WORK_DIR/run_summary.json

Script options:

  • --viewer — launch web viewer (opens http://localhost:8000)
  • --viewer-port PORT — use a different port
  • --config FILE — custom MassGen config YAML
  • --output-file FILE — override result path (default: $WORK_DIR/result.md)
  • --no-cwd-context — disable read-only CWD access
  • --extra-args "..." — pass additional massgen CLI flags

Timing: expect 15-45 minutes. Do not assume something is stuck — MassGen runs multiple agents through several rounds of iteration.

Step 5: Parse the Output

The output depends on the mode. The winner's workspace path is shown in $WORK_DIR/result.md (look for "Workspace cwd" or check status.json in the log directory for workspace_paths).

General mode: the winner's answer is in $WORK_DIR/result.md. Any files the agents created are in the winner's workspace (path shown in result.md). Copy or reference the workspace files as needed.

Evaluate mode: three files — verdict.json, next_tasks.json, critique_packet.md. Read verdict.json first to determine iterate vs converged. See references/evaluate/workflow.md for full output structure.

Plan mode: project_plan.json — structured task list with chunks, dependencies, and verification. May include auxiliary files in research/, framework/, risks/ subdirectories. See references/plan/workflow.md for full output structure.

Spec mode: project_spec.json — EARS requirements with chunks, rationale, and verification. May include auxiliary files in research/, design/, decisions/ subdirectories. See references/spec/workflow.md for full output structure.

Step 6: Ground in Your Native Task System

This is the most critical step for evaluate, plan, and spec modes. MassGen produced a structured result — now you must internalize it by entering your native task/plan mode and enumerating every task or requirement as a tracked item. Without this, the plan is just text that fades from context as you work.

For general mode, grounding is optional — it applies when the output contains a structured task list or action items, but many general tasks produce artifacts (code, documents, designs) rather than task lists.

Why this matters: agents that skip this step tend to execute the first few tasks, then drift — forgetting verification steps, skipping later tasks, or losing track of dependencies. Grounding forces you to commit to the full scope before executing anything.

For all modes:

  1. Enter your task planning mode (e.g., TodoWrite in Claude Code, task tracking in Codex, or whatever native tracking your environment provides)
  2. Create one tracked task per item from the MassGen output:
    • Evaluate: each task from next_tasks.json becomes a tracked task, preserving implementation_guidance, depends_on, and verification
    • Plan: each task from project_plan.json becomes a tracked task, preserving chunk ordering, dependencies, and verification criteria
    • Spec: each requirement from project_spec.json becomes a tracked task (implement + verify), preserving priority, dependencies, and acceptance criteria
  3. Preserve the dependency order — don't flatten the DAG. Tasks in chunk C01 must complete before C02 tasks begin
  4. Include verification as explicit tasks — don't just track "implement X", also track "verify X meets [criteria]". Verification that isn't tracked doesn't happen
  5. Mark each task's status as you work: pending → in_progress → completed

Then execute in order, updating status as you go. When you complete a task, check it off and move to the next one. This creates an execution trace that keeps you honest about what's done and what remains.

Step 7: Execute and Iterate

General: read result.md for the winning answer. Copy deliverable files from the winner's workspace if applicable.

Evaluate: read verdict.json — if "iterate", check approach_assessment.ceiling_status in next_tasks.json first:

  • ceiling_not_reached → execute fix_tasks, then evolution_tasks as stretch
  • ceiling_approaching → execute fix_tasks, then evolution_tasks
  • ceiling_reached → consider re-invoking plan mode with evaluation findings (see Plan-Evaluate Loop below) If "converged", proceed to delivery.

Plan / Spec: store the result as a living document (see below), then execute the grounded tasks chunk by chunk. At tasks marked with eval_checkpoint, invoke evaluate mode to assess approach viability before continuing (see Plan-Evaluate Loop below).

Living Document Protocol (Plan & Spec Modes)

This is the most important section for plan/spec modes — it defines how the output is used after MassGen produces it.

Store

Adopt the MassGen output into .massgen/plans/ using the existing PlanStorage infrastructure:

.massgen/plans/plan_<timestamp>/
├── workspace/          # Mutable working copy
│   ├── plan.json       # (renamed from project_plan.json) or spec.json
│   └── research/       # Auxiliary files from MassGen output
├── frozen/             # Immutable snapshot (identical to workspace/ at creation)
│   ├── plan.json       # or spec.json
│   └── research/
└── plan_metadata.json  # artifact_type, status, chunk_order, context_paths

Copy project_plan.json → workspace/plan.json (or project_spec.json → workspace/spec.json). Copy any auxiliary directories. Create frozen/ as an identical snapshot.

Read on Restart

FIRST ACTION in every new session: read workspace/plan.json (or workspace/spec.json). This is the source of truth for what's done and what's next.

Update Continuously

As tasks complete (plan) or requirements are implemented (spec), update the workspace copy. Mark status, add notes, record discoveries. The workspace copy is a living document.

Check Drift

Periodically compare workspace/ against frozen/. The existing PlanSession.compute_plan_diff() returns a divergence_score (0.0 = no drift, 1.0 = complete rewrite). High drift means re-evaluate whether the plan/spec is still valid.

Refine When Stuck

If the plan/spec proves wrong or incomplete, re-invoke this skill with the workspace copy as "What Already Exists" to get multi-agent refinement. This creates a new plan directory with a fresh frozen/ snapshot.

Don't Drift Silently

If you deviate from the plan/spec, update the workspace copy first. An outdated plan is worse than no plan.

Mode Overviews

General

Run any task through MassGen's multi-agent system. Agents independently produce solutions and converge through checklist-gated voting. Use this for tasks that don't fit neatly into evaluate, plan, or spec — writing, code generation, research, analysis, design, or anything where multiple perspectives improve the result.

See references/general/workflow.md for the context template and output handling.

Evaluate

Critique existing work artifacts. Evaluator agents inspect your code, documents, or deliverables and produce a structured critique with machine-readable verdict, per-criterion scores, and actionable improvement tasks. The checklist-gated voting system ensures agents converge on the strongest critique.

See references/evaluate/workflow.md for the full context template, output structure, and examples.

Plan

Create or refine a structured project plan. Planning agents decompose the goal into a task DAG with chunks, dependencies, verification criteria, and technology choices. Each round of MassGen iteration improves task quality — descriptions get more actionable, verification gets more specific, sequencing gets tighter.

See references/plan/workflow.md for the full context template, output format, and lifecycle.

Spec

Create or refine a requirements specification. Spec agents produce EARS-formatted requirements with acceptance criteria, rationale, and verification. Iteration focuses on precision — each round eliminates ambiguities, fills gaps, and strengthens edge case coverage.

See references/spec/workflow.md for the full context template, output format, and lifecycle.

Plan-Evaluate Loop

For complex or creative projects, plan and evaluate modes work together in a feedback loop:

Plan → Execute → Evaluate → (fix OR re-plan) → Execute → Evaluate → ...

When to Use the Loop

  • The task has exploratory components (visual design, creative writing, UX)
  • The project is complex enough that the initial plan is partly speculative
  • Quality expectations are high and "correct but adequate" isn't enough
  • Prior iterations show diminishing returns

Loop Protocol

  1. Plan: invoke plan mode. Agents classify tasks as deterministic or exploratory and create prototypes to validate assumptions
  2. Execute: implement the plan chunk by chunk
  3. Evaluate: at eval_checkpoint tasks (or after any exploratory chunk), invoke evaluate mode
  4. Decide: read approach_assessment in the evaluation output:
    • ceiling_not_reached → execute fix_tasks, continue
    • ceiling_approaching → execute fix_tasks + evolution_tasks, continue
    • ceiling_reached → re-invoke plan mode with evaluation discoveries
  5. Evolve: if re-planning, pass approach_assessment and breakthroughs as context. The new plan amplifies what worked and avoids approaches that hit their ceiling
  6. Repeat until evaluation returns "converged"

What Makes This Different from Just Re-Running Eval

  • Eval assesses whether the APPROACH has room to grow, not just whether the OUTPUT has defects
  • When the approach is limited, the loop goes back to PLANNING, not just more implementation
  • Breakthroughs discovered during execution feed FORWARD into new plans, not just into preserve lists
  • The plan evolves based on evidence from execution, not speculation

Loop Termination

  • Max 3 plan mutations per chunk — if still not converging, escalate to user
  • If evaluation returns "converged" with ceiling_not_reached, the loop is complete
  • If the user provides explicit direction, follow it regardless of ceiling status

Condensed Examples

General: Multi-Agent Task Execution

WORK_DIR=".massgen/general/$(date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S)"
mkdir -p "$WORK_DIR"

cat > $WORK_DIR/context.md << 'EOF'
## Task
Build a responsive landing page for a developer tool that converts
CSV files to JSON. Single page with hero, features, and CTA sections.

## Context
- Target audience: developers and data engineers
- Tech stack: HTML, CSS, vanilla JS (no frameworks)
- Must work on mobile and desktop

## Quality Expectations
- Visually polished, not template-looking
- Fast load time, no external dependencies
EOF

# Build prompt from references/general/prompt_template.md, then run
# No --criteria-file — criteria auto-generated from task
bash "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/massgen_run.sh" \
  --work-dir "$WORK_DIR" \
  --prompt-file "$WORK_DIR/prompt.md" \
  --viewer

Evaluate: Pre-PR Review

WORK_DIR=".massgen/evaluate/$(date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S)"
mkdir -p "$WORK_DIR"

# Write context (scope: specific deliverables, no quality opinions)
cat > $WORK_DIR/context.md << 'EOF'
## Deliverables in Scope
- `src/api/handler.ts` — API request handler
- `src/hooks/useAuth.ts` — authentication hook

## Out of Scope
- Test files, CI config

## Original Task
Add JWT authentication to the API layer

## What Was Done
Implemented JWT validation in handler and auth hook for React components.

## Verification Evidence
pytest: 24 passed, 0 failed
EOF

# Write criteria (or omit --eval-criteria to use default preset)
cat > $WORK_DIR/criteria.json << 'EOF'
[
  {"text": "Auth security: JWT validation covers expiration, signature, and audience checks.", "category": "must"},
  {"text": "Error handling: invalid/expired tokens produce clear error responses.", "category": "must"},
  {"text": "Code quality: clean separation between auth logic and business logic.", "category": "should"}
]
EOF

# Build prompt from template, then run
bash "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/massgen_run.sh" \
  --work-dir "$WORK_DIR" \
  --prompt-file "$WORK_DIR/prompt.md" \
  --criteria-file "$WORK_DIR/criteria.json" \
  --viewer

Plan: New Feature Planning

WORK_DIR=".massgen/plan/$(date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S)"
mkdir -p "$WORK_DIR"

cat > $WORK_DIR/context.md << 'EOF'
## Goal
Add real-time collaboration to the document editor — multiple users
editing the same document simultaneously with cursor presence.

## Constraints
- Must work with existing PostgreSQL database
- Timeline: 2 weeks
- Team: 2 engineers

## Existing Context
Express.js backend, React frontend, WebSocket already used for notifications.

## Success Criteria
Two users can edit the same document with <500ms sync latency and no data loss.
EOF

# Build prompt from references/plan/prompt_template.md, then run
bash "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/massgen_run.sh" \
  --work-dir "$WORK_DIR" \
  --prompt-file "$WORK_DIR/prompt.md" \
  --criteria-preset planning \
  --viewer

Spec: Feature Specification

WORK_DIR=".massgen/spec/$(date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S)"
mkdir -p "$WORK_DIR"

cat > $WORK_DIR/context.md << 'EOF'
## Problem Statement
Users cannot recover deleted items — deletion is permanent and irreversible.

## User Needs / Personas
- End users: accidentally delete items, need easy recovery
- Admins: need to purge items for compliance after retention period

## Constraints
- PostgreSQL database, soft-delete pattern preferred
- 30-day retention before permanent purge
- Must not break existing API consumers
EOF

# Build prompt from references/spec/prompt_template.md, then run
bash "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/massgen_run.sh" \
  --work-dir "$WORK_DIR" \
  --prompt-file "$WORK_DIR/prompt.md" \
  --criteria-preset spec \
  --viewer

Reference Files

  • references/general/workflow.md — general mode context template and output handling
  • references/general/prompt_template.md — general prompt template with placeholders
  • references/criteria_guide.md — how to write quality criteria (format, tiers, examples)
  • references/evaluate/workflow.md — evaluate mode context template, output structure, examples
  • references/evaluate/prompt_template.md — evaluation prompt template with placeholders
  • references/plan/workflow.md — plan mode context template, output format, lifecycle
  • references/plan/prompt_template.md — planning prompt template with placeholders
  • references/spec/workflow.md — spec mode context template, output format, lifecycle
  • references/spec/prompt_template.md — spec prompt template with placeholders
  • massgen/subagent_types/round_evaluator/SUBAGENT.md — source methodology for evaluation
  • massgen/skills/massgen-develops-massgen/SKILL.md — reference pattern for --automation