PAL Analyze - Code Analysis
Systematic code analysis covering architecture, performance, maintainability, and patterns.
When to Use
- Understanding unfamiliar codebases
- Architectural review and assessment
- Performance analysis and optimization
- Code quality evaluation
- Pattern identification
- Technical debt assessment
Quick Start
# Start architecture analysis
result = mcp__pal__analyze(
step="Analyzing authentication system architecture",
step_number=1,
total_steps=2,
next_step_required=True,
findings="Beginning architecture review",
analysis_type="architecture",
output_format="detailed",
relevant_files=[
"/app/auth/service.py",
"/app/auth/middleware.py"
],
confidence="exploring"
)
Analysis Types
| Type | Focus |
|------|-------|
| architecture | System design, patterns, modularity |
| performance | Bottlenecks, optimization opportunities |
| security | Vulnerabilities, auth issues |
| quality | Code smells, maintainability |
| general | Comprehensive overview |
Output Formats
| Format | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| summary | High-level overview |
| detailed | In-depth analysis |
| actionable | Prioritized recommendations |
Required Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|-----------|------|-------------|
| step | string | Analysis narrative |
| step_number | int | Current step |
| total_steps | int | Estimated total |
| next_step_required | bool | More analysis needed? |
| findings | string | Discoveries and insights |
Optional Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|-----------|------|-------------|
| analysis_type | enum | architecture/performance/security/quality/general |
| output_format | enum | summary/detailed/actionable |
| confidence | enum | exploring → certain |
| relevant_files | list | Files under analysis |
| files_checked | list | All files examined |
| issues_found | list | Issues with severity |
| continuation_id | string | Continue session |
| model | string | Override model |
Example: Performance Analysis
mcp__pal__analyze(
step="Identifying performance bottlenecks in data processing pipeline",
step_number=1,
total_steps=2,
next_step_required=True,
findings="Scanning for N+1 queries, inefficient loops, missing caching",
analysis_type="performance",
output_format="actionable",
relevant_files=[
"/app/services/data_processor.py",
"/app/models/report.py"
],
confidence="exploring"
)
What to Document in Findings
Include both strengths and concerns:
- Architecture: Patterns used, coupling, cohesion
- Performance: Complexity, caching, query patterns
- Security: Auth flows, input validation, secrets
- Quality: Duplication, naming, test coverage
Best Practices
- Be systematic - Cover all relevant aspects
- Document strengths - Not just problems
- Prioritize issues - By severity and impact
- Consider context - Team size, timeline, constraints
- Provide evidence - Reference specific code
Scan to join WeChat group