Using Ring Technical Writing Specialists
The ring-tw-team plugin provides specialized agents for technical documentation. Use them via Task tool with subagent_type:.
Remember: Follow the ORCHESTRATOR principle from ring:using-ring. Dispatch agents to handle documentation tasks; don't write complex documentation directly.
3 Documentation Specialists
| Agent | Specialization | Use When |
|-------|---------------|----------|
| ring:functional-writer | Conceptual docs, guides, tutorials, best practices, workflows | Writing product guides, tutorials, "how to" content |
| ring:api-writer | REST API reference, endpoints, schemas, errors, field descriptions | Documenting API endpoints, request/response examples |
| ring:docs-reviewer | Voice/tone, structure, completeness, clarity, accuracy | Reviewing drafts, pre-publication quality check |
Documentation Standards Summary
Voice and Tone
- Assertive, but never arrogant – Say what needs to be said, clearly
- Encouraging and empowering – Guide users through complexity
- Tech-savvy, but human – Use technical terms when needed, prioritize clarity
- Humble and open – Confident but always learning
Capitalization
- Sentence case for all headings and titles
- Only first letter and proper nouns capitalized
- ✅ "Getting started with the API"
- ❌ "Getting Started With The API"
Structure Patterns
- Lead with clear definition paragraph
- Use bullet points for key characteristics
- Separate sections with
---dividers - Include info boxes and warnings where needed
- Link to related API reference
- Add code examples for technical topics
Dispatching Specialists
Parallel dispatch for comprehensive documentation (single message, multiple Tasks):
Task #1: functional-writer (write the guide)
Task #2: api-writer (write API reference)
(Both run in parallel)
Then:
Task #3: docs-reviewer (review both)
Available in This Plugin
Agents: functional-writer, api-writer, docs-reviewer
Skills:
- using-tw-team: Plugin introduction
- writing-functional-docs: Functional doc patterns
- writing-api-docs: API reference patterns
- documentation-structure: Hierarchy and organization
- voice-and-tone: Voice guidelines
- documentation-review: Quality checklist
- api-field-descriptions: Field description patterns
Commands:
- /write-guide: Start functional guide
- /write-api: Start API documentation
- /review-docs: Review existing docs
Integration with Other Plugins
| Plugin | Use For | |--------|---------| | ring:using-ring (default) | ORCHESTRATOR principle | | ring:using-dev-team | Developer agents for technical accuracy | | ring:using-pm-team | Pre-dev planning before documentation |
ORCHESTRATOR Principle
- You're the orchestrator – Dispatch specialists, don't write directly
- Let specialists apply standards – They know voice, tone, structure
- Combine with other plugins – API writers + backend engineers for accuracy
✅ "I need documentation for the new feature. Let me dispatch functional-writer."
❌ "I'll manually write all the documentation myself."
Standards Loading (MANDATORY)
Before dispatching any documentation agent:
- Understand the documentation type - Functional guide vs API reference
- Load relevant skills - Writing patterns for the document type
- Verify prerequisites - Product knowledge, terminology, audience
HARD GATE: MUST dispatch appropriate specialist (not write directly).
Blocker Criteria - STOP and Report
| Condition | Decision | Action | |-----------|----------|--------| | Documentation type unclear | STOP | Report: "Need to clarify functional guide vs API reference" | | No subject matter source | STOP | Report: "Need source material or SME access" | | Audience undefined | STOP | Report: "Need target audience definition" | | Product not yet defined | STOP | Report: "Cannot document undefined features" |
Cannot Be Overridden
These requirements are NON-NEGOTIABLE:
- MUST dispatch specialist agents (not write directly)
- MUST use appropriate agent for document type
- MUST follow ORCHESTRATOR principle
- CANNOT skip documentation review before publication
- CANNOT mix agent responsibilities
Severity Calibration
| Severity | Criteria | Examples | |----------|----------|----------| | CRITICAL | Writing directly instead of dispatching | Orchestrator writes full documentation | | HIGH | Wrong agent for document type | Using api-writer for conceptual guide | | MEDIUM | Skipping review step | Publishing without docs-reviewer check | | LOW | Suboptimal agent combination | Could parallelize dispatches |
Pressure Resistance
| User Says | Your Response | |-----------|---------------| | "Just write the docs quickly, no need for specialists" | "MUST dispatch specialists. They apply consistent standards. I'll dispatch the appropriate agent." | | "Skip the review, we're in a hurry" | "Documentation review is REQUIRED before publication. I'll dispatch docs-reviewer." | | "One agent can do it all" | "Each agent has specialized knowledge. I'll dispatch the correct specialist for each document type." | | "README is enough documentation" | "README is an entry point, not complete documentation. I'll dispatch agents for proper docs." | | "Developers can figure it out from the code" | "Code is NOT documentation. MUST create proper documentation. I'll dispatch the appropriate writers." |
Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Why It's WRONG | Required Action | |-----------------|----------------|-----------------| | "Simple docs, I can write directly" | Simple ≠ no standards. Specialists ensure consistency | MUST dispatch specialist | | "Faster to write myself" | Speed without quality creates tech debt | Dispatch agents, ensure quality | | "Already know the product well" | Knowledge ≠ documentation skill | Use specialists for writing | | "Review takes too long" | Review catches issues before users do | MUST include review step | | "Documentation isn't critical path" | Documentation IS part of the feature | Treat docs as required deliverable | | "Internal docs don't need standards" | Internal users deserve quality too | Apply same standards everywhere |
When This Skill is Not Needed
Signs that documentation workflow is already correct:
- Appropriate specialist dispatched for each document type
- ORCHESTRATOR principle followed (not writing directly)
- Documentation review included in workflow
- Parallel dispatch used for efficiency
- Clear handoffs between agents
If all above are true: Workflow is correct, proceed with dispatches.
Scan to join WeChat group