返回 Skill 列表
extension
分类: 开发与工程无需 API Key

assertion-patterns

实际输出验证与模拟调用。在将违反测试T1-T4转换为验证可观察行为时使用。

person作者: jakexiaohubgithub

Assertion Patterns

Purpose

Transform T1-T4 violating assertions into real behavior verification. This skill provides pattern libraries for converting mock-based tests to tests that verify observable output.

When to Use

Load this skill when:

  • Rewriting tests flagged by test-audit
  • Generating verification scripts via bulwark-verify skill
  • Implementing test-audit Step 7 rewrites

Prerequisite Checks (T0) - CRITICAL

Before checking T1-T4 violations, verify these prerequisites. Tests failing these checks are "testing nothing real" - they pass but provide zero confidence.

T0.1: Production Module Imports

Test files MUST import functions from actual production modules.

| Valid | Invalid | |-------|---------| | import { calculate } from '../src/calculator' | Function defined within test file | | from calculator import add | def add(a, b): return a + b in test |

Detection:

  • Scan test file for function definitions
  • Check if tested functions are imported vs defined inline
  • Flag if test calls functions not imported from production code

Violation Response:

"Test defines production logic inline. Move {function_name} to production module and import it. Tests should verify production code, not self-defined code."

T0.2: Separation of Concerns

Test files MUST NOT contain functions representing production logic.

Allowed in test files:

  • Test functions (test_*, it(), describe())
  • Test helpers/fixtures (make_*, create_*, setup_*)
  • Mock factories (mock_*, fake_*, stub_*)
  • Pytest fixtures (@pytest.fixture)

Not allowed:

  • Business logic functions
  • Utility functions that should be in production
  • Any function that would make sense in src/

Detection:

  • Identify all function definitions in test file
  • Check naming patterns against allowed prefixes
  • Flag functions that don't match test/helper patterns

T0.3: Function Naming Conventions

Functions in test files should follow specific naming patterns.

| Legitimate Prefixes | Purpose | |---------------------|---------| | test_* | Test functions (pytest) | | _* (underscore) | Private helpers | | pytest_* | Pytest hooks | | make_*, create_* | Factory helpers | | mock_*, fake_*, stub_* | Mock factories | | setup_*, teardown_* | Lifecycle helpers |

Any other function definition raises suspicion - likely production code incorrectly placed in test files.


Pattern Categories

1. Function Call Verification

| Anti-Pattern (Mock) | Real Pattern | |---------------------|--------------| | expect(fn).toHaveBeenCalled() | const result = fn(); expect(result).toBe(expected) | | expect(fn).toHaveBeenCalledWith(arg) | const result = fn(arg); expect(result.field).toBeDefined() | | jest.spyOn(module, 'fn').mockReturnValue(x) | const result = module.fn(); expect(result).toBe(expected) |

Transformation example:

// BEFORE (T1 violation - mocking system under test)
jest.spyOn(calculator, 'add').mockReturnValue(5);
expect(calculator.add(2, 3)).toBe(5);

// AFTER (real verification)
expect(calculator.add(2, 3)).toBe(5);  // Actually runs add()

2. Process Spawn Verification

| Anti-Pattern (Mock) | Real Pattern | |---------------------|--------------| | jest.spyOn(cp, 'spawn').mockReturnValue(mockProc) | const proc = spawn(...); await waitForReady(proc) | | expect(spawn).toHaveBeenCalled() | expect(await isPortOpen(PORT)).toBe(true) | | expect(spawn).toHaveBeenCalledWith(cmd, args) | const output = execSync(cmd); expect(output).toContain(expected) |

Transformation example:

// BEFORE (T1 violation - mocking spawn)
const mockProcess = { on: jest.fn(), stdout: mockStream };
jest.spyOn(child_process, 'spawn').mockReturnValue(mockProcess);
await startProxy();
expect(child_process.spawn).toHaveBeenCalledWith('proxy', ['--port', '8080']);

// AFTER (real verification)
await startProxy();
expect(await checkPort(8080)).toBe(true);  // Port actually open
const response = await fetch('http://localhost:8080/health');
expect(response.status).toBe(200);  // Proxy actually responds

3. File Operation Verification

| Anti-Pattern (Mock) | Real Pattern | |---------------------|--------------| | jest.mock('fs') | Use real fs with temp directory | | expect(fs.writeFile).toHaveBeenCalled() | expect(fs.existsSync(path)).toBe(true) | | expect(fs.readFile).toHaveBeenCalledWith(path) | const content = fs.readFileSync(path); expect(content).toContain('expected') |

Transformation example:

// BEFORE (T2 violation - call-only assertion)
await saveConfig(config);
expect(fs.writeFile).toHaveBeenCalled();

// AFTER (result verification)
await saveConfig(config);
expect(fs.existsSync(configPath)).toBe(true);
const saved = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(configPath, 'utf8'));
expect(saved.setting).toBe(config.setting);

4. HTTP Request Verification

| Anti-Pattern (Mock) | Real Pattern | |---------------------|--------------| | jest.mock('node-fetch') | Use MSW or test server | | expect(fetch).toHaveBeenCalledWith(url) | const resp = await fetch(url); expect(resp.status).toBe(200) | | Mock response data | Actual response from test server |

Transformation example:

// BEFORE (T3 violation - mocking integration boundary)
jest.mock('node-fetch');
fetch.mockResolvedValue({ json: () => ({ id: 1 }) });
const user = await fetchUser(1);
expect(fetch).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/api/users/1');

// AFTER (real integration with MSW)
import { setupServer } from 'msw/node';
import { rest } from 'msw';

const server = setupServer(
  rest.get('/api/users/:id', (req, res, ctx) => {
    return res(ctx.json({ id: req.params.id, name: 'Test User' }));
  })
);

beforeAll(() => server.listen());
afterAll(() => server.close());

const user = await fetchUser(1);  // Real fetch, intercepted at network level
expect(user.name).toBe('Test User');

5. Database Verification

| Anti-Pattern (Mock) | Real Pattern | |---------------------|--------------| | expect(db.save).toHaveBeenCalled() | await db.save(data); const found = await db.find(id); expect(found).toBeDefined() | | expect(db.delete).toHaveBeenCalledWith(id) | await db.delete(id); expect(await db.find(id)).toBeNull() | | jest.mock('./database') | Use test database instance |

Transformation example:

// BEFORE (T2 violation - call-only)
await saveUser(user);
expect(db.insert).toHaveBeenCalledWith('users', user);

// AFTER (result verification)
await saveUser(user);
const saved = await db.findOne('users', { id: user.id });
expect(saved).toBeDefined();
expect(saved.email).toBe(user.email);

T1-T4 Transformation Rules

T1: Mock System Under Test -> Remove mock, verify real output

The system under test should NEVER be mocked. Remove the mock and verify actual behavior.

// T1 violation: Mocking the function being tested
jest.spyOn(calculator, 'add').mockReturnValue(5);
expect(calculator.add(2, 3)).toBe(5);  // Always passes regardless of implementation

// Fixed: Test real implementation
expect(calculator.add(2, 3)).toBe(5);  // Fails if add() is broken

T2: Call-Only Assertion -> Add result assertion

Verifying a function was called is insufficient. Verify the RESULT of that call.

// T2 violation: Only checks call happened
await saveConfig(config);
expect(db.save).toHaveBeenCalled();  // Passes even if wrong data saved

// Fixed: Verify the actual saved data
await saveConfig(config);
const saved = await db.find(config.id);
expect(saved.value).toBe(config.value);  // Fails if wrong data saved

T3: Mock Integration Boundary -> Use test infrastructure

Integration tests should test real integration. Use MSW, test servers, or in-memory DBs.

// T3 violation: Mocking HTTP in integration test
jest.mock('node-fetch');
const data = await fetchUserData(id);  // Not testing real HTTP

// Fixed: Use MSW to intercept at network level
const server = setupServer(rest.get('/api/user/:id', handler));
const data = await fetchUserData(id);  // Real fetch, real HTTP, controlled response

T3+: Broken Integration Chain -> Chain real function outputs

Integration tests should chain real outputs through the pipeline.

// T3+ violation: Using mock data instead of real output
const mockOrder = { id: 1, items: [{ sku: 'ABC', qty: 2 }] };
await processOrder(mockOrder);  // Not testing real order creation

// Fixed: Chain real function outputs
const order = await createOrder({ sku: 'ABC', qty: 2 });  // Real order
await processOrder(order);  // Processes real order data
const result = await getOrderStatus(order.id);
expect(result.status).toBe('processed');

Quick Reference: Violation to Pattern

| Violation | Pattern Category | Fix Strategy | |-----------|------------------|--------------| | T0.1 | Prerequisites | Move function to production, import it | | T0.2 | Prerequisites | Extract non-test functions to src/ | | T0.3 | Prerequisites | Rename or move functions | | T1 | Function Call | Remove mock, call real function | | T2 | Any category | Add result assertion after call | | T3 | HTTP/DB/Process | Use MSW, test DB, or spawn real process | | T3+ | Integration Chain | Chain real outputs, don't pass mocks |


Diagnostic Output

Write diagnostic output to logs/diagnostics/assertion-patterns-{YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS}.yaml:

skill: assertion-patterns
timestamp: {ISO-8601}
diagnostics:
  t0_checks:
    t0_1_imports: pass|fail
    t0_2_separation: pass|fail
    t0_3_naming: pass|fail
  patterns_applied: [T1, T2, T3]
  transformations_suggested: 3
  files_analyzed: 1
  completion_status: success