返回 Skill 列表
extension
分类: 开发与工程无需 API Key

claude-permissions-audit

审查并重新组织所有配置文件中的Claude Code权限设置(全局settings.json、项目settings.local.json、dotfiles副本)。识别冗余、错误放置的权限以及缺乏读/写组织的问题。生成一个清晰的布局,其中全局设置是事实来源,而项目本地文件仅包含特定于项目的覆盖。每当用户提到审查权限、清理设置、审核允许的工具、重新组织settings.json或询问“我有什么权限”时,请使用此技能。在添加新的MCP服务器或工具并希望决定预先允许什么时也使用此技能。触发词:“review permissions”、“audit settings”、“clean up settings.json”、“permissions audit”、“/permissions-audit”。

person作者: jakexiaohubgithub

Permissions Audit

Review and reorganize Claude Code permission settings so global settings are the source of truth, project-local files stay minimal, and read vs write operations have clear separation.

When to Use

  • Reviewing what tools and commands are pre-allowed
  • Cleaning up accumulated ad-hoc permission entries
  • After adding a new MCP server and deciding which operations to pre-allow
  • Ensuring global vs project-local settings are properly split
  • Periodic hygiene check on permission sprawl

Phase 1: Discover All Settings Files

Scan for every settings file that contributes to the effective permission set.

Locations to check:

  • ~/.claude/settings.json — global settings (source of truth)
  • <project>/.claude/settings.json — project shared settings (committed)
  • <project>/.claude/settings.local.json — project local settings (gitignored)
  • ~/.claude/.claude/settings.local.json — home directory project local
  • Any dotfiles-managed copy (e.g. home/.claude/settings.json in a dotfiles repo)

Read all of them in parallel. If a file doesn't exist, note it and move on.

Phase 2: Audit

For each permission entry across all files, assess:

  1. Redundancy — Is this entry already covered by a broader rule elsewhere?
    • Example: Bash(gws calendar events:*) is redundant when Bash(gws:*) exists globally
  2. Misplacement — Is this general-purpose but stuck in a project-local file?
    • Example: Bash(python3:*) in project local when it's useful everywhere
  3. Inconsistent granularity — Are similar tools allowed at different specificity levels?
    • Example: Global has gh pr list, gh pr view individually, but project local has gh:*
  4. Missing read/write distinction — Are read-only and write operations mixed together?
  5. Stale entries — One-time approvals that accumulated (e.g., a specific git command with hardcoded paths)

Present findings as a table with issues and proposed resolution for each.

Phase 3: Propose Reorganization

Design the new layout following these principles:

Global settings (source of truth)

Organize permissions into labeled sections by grouping related entries together. Do NOT use JSON comments (// or /* */) — settings.json must be valid JSON. Instead, rely on the ordering of entries to convey grouping. Within the allow array, cluster related permissions together in this order:

Section order (group entries in this sequence, no separators needed):

filesystem reads            — cat, tree, grep, wc, file reads
<lang> inspection           — go doc, cargo check, linters (no side effects)
GitHub CLI reads            — gh pr list/view/diff, gh issue list (no mutations)
external tool reads         — calendar, slack CLI, other read CLIs
web reads                   — WebSearch, WebFetch with domain allowlist
MCP <service> reads         — list, get, describe, search operations
build / test / install      — go build, cargo test, pnpm install (local side effects)
skills                      — Skill(superpowers:*), etc.

Project-local settings (minimal overrides)

Only keep entries that are genuinely project-specific:

  • Broader tool access needed for a specific workflow (e.g., Bash(gh:*) for a repo that creates PRs frequently)
  • Project-specific MCP tools not used elsewhere
  • Temporary elevated access during active development

Clarifying questions

Before applying, ask the user about edge cases. Common questions:

  • Scope of CLI tools: Should gh:* (all subcommands) go global, or keep read-only globally with broader access per-project?
  • MCP write operations: Which write operations (send message, create issue) should stay prompted vs pre-allowed?
  • Environment separation: Should dev and prod data sources have the same read access, or should prod be more restrictive?
  • Dotfiles sync: Does the user maintain a dotfiles copy that needs updating?

Adapt questions to what's actually ambiguous — don't ask about things that are obvious from context.

Phase 4: Apply Changes

Once the user confirms the plan:

  1. Write the updated global settings file
  2. Write the trimmed project-local settings file
  3. Update any dotfiles copies to stay in sync
  4. Clear out entries from other local files that were absorbed into global

Phase 5: Summary

Present a before/after comparison:

| File | Before | After | |------|--------|-------| | Global | N flat entries | M entries in K sections | | Project local | X entries | Y entries (project-specific only) |

List what moved where, and what still requires prompting (write operations not pre-allowed).