Curriculum Reviewer Skill

This skill comprehensively reviews educational materials for quality, pedagogical soundness, and consistency.

When to Use

Use this skill when the user:

• Asks to review curriculum or lesson materials
• Wants quality assurance on educational content
• Requests feedback on teaching materials
• Needs consistency check across multiple lessons
• Wants to audit materials before publishing
• Asks for improvement recommendations

What This Skill Does

1. Identifies Scope of review:

   • Entire curriculum
   • Specific class or lesson
   • Specific material type (lessons, slides, assessments)
   • Particular aspects (pedagogy, formatting, alignment)

2. Invokes Multiple Subagents for comprehensive review:

   lesson-planner subagent reviews:

   • Learning objectives alignment
   • Pedagogical soundness
   • Timing and pacing realism
   • Differentiation strategies
   • Hands-on activity quality
   • Assessment alignment with objectives

   slide-designer subagent reviews:

   • Slide clarity and visual design
   • One-idea-per-slide principle
   • Formatting consistency
   • Engagement elements
   • Presenter notes quality

   assessment-builder subagent reviews:

   • Rubric clarity and fairness
   • Criteria alignment with objectives
   • Performance level descriptions
   • Example quality and usefulness
   • Student-friendly language

   github-stylist subagent reviews:

   • Markdown formatting consistency
   • Professional appearance
   • Navigation and linking
   • README completeness
   • Overall polish

3. Creates Comprehensive Review Report with:

   • Strengths Identified: What's working well
   • Areas for Improvement: Specific issues found
   • Recommendations: Concrete suggestions for fixes
   • Priority Levels: Critical vs. nice-to-have improvements
   • Consistency Issues: Patterns across materials
   • Alignment Check: Objectives → content → assessment

4. Offers Action Plan:

   • Prioritized list of improvements
   • Option to apply automated fixes
   • Suggestions for manual edits

Review Criteria

Pedagogical Quality:

• Clear, measurable learning objectives
• Age-appropriate content and examples
• Effective differentiation strategies
• Authentic, hands-on activities
• Aligned assessments

Content Quality:

• Accurate information
• Relevant, current examples
• Clear explanations
• Logical progression
• Complete materials

Consistency:

• Formatting uniformity
• Style consistency
• Voice and tone
• Terminology usage
• Visual presentation

Usability:

• Ready-to-teach materials
• Clear instructions
• Appropriate timing
• Necessary resources listed
• Student-facing clarity

Output Structure

Review reports include:

• Executive Summary: Overview of findings
• Detailed Findings by category
• Specific Examples of issues
• Recommendations with priority
• Consistency Analysis across materials
• Action Items checklist

Example Usage

User: "Review all the Class 1 materials and make sure everything is high quality"

This skill will conduct a comprehensive review and provide detailed feedback with recommendations.