返回 Skill 列表
extension
分类: 开发与工程无需 API Key

interrogatories-to-defendant

起草个人伤害诉讼中原告向被告提出的询问书,包括标题、定义、说明和实质性问题。当用户需要起草询问书、向被告提出书面发现请求或个人伤害发现集时触发。执行数字限制、子部分计数和争议性询问惯例。

person作者: jakexiaohubgithub

Interrogatories to Defendant — Personal Injury

Drafts interrogatories that pin down defendant's factual contentions, identify witnesses and evidence, and build the foundation for depositions and trial.

Required Inputs

  1. Caption details — court, case number, party names
  2. Operative pleadings — complaint (claims) and answer (affirmative defenses)
  3. Jurisdiction — federal (FRCP 33) or state; confirm applicable rules
  4. Numerical limit — FRCP 33 default is 25 including discrete subparts; state rules vary
  5. Set designation — first, second, etc.
  6. Attorney info — name, bar number, firm, address, phone, email

Document Structure

1. Caption

Standard litigation caption. Title: "Plaintiff's [First/Second/etc.] Set of Interrogatories to Defendant."

2. Introduction

  • Propound under governing rule (FRCP 33 or state equivalent)
  • State response deadline (30 days unless local rule differs)
  • Require separate, full, written answers under oath

3. Definitions

Define at minimum:

| Term | Scope | |------|-------| | IDENTIFY (person) | Name, address, phone, employer, relationship to parties | | IDENTIFY (document) | Author, date, type, custodian, location, Bates number | | IDENTIFY (communication) | Date, participants, medium, substance | | PERSON | Natural persons and all entities | | DOCUMENT | All tangible and ESI formats | | COMMUNICATION | Every form of information exchange | | INCIDENT | Specific event(s) giving rise to the lawsuit | | YOU/YOUR | Defendant including agents, employees, representatives |

Draft broadly to prevent evasion; keep defensible.

4. Instructions

  • Duty to supplement (FRCP 26(e) or state equivalent)
  • Answer each interrogatory separately and fully
  • Privilege claims require a privilege log
  • Duty to investigate despite lack of personal knowledge
  • Answer subparts separately
  • Business-records option under FRCP 33(d) with specification

5. Substantive Interrogatories

Tailor to the specific facts, claims, and defenses. Organize by category:

A. Witness Identification

  • All persons with knowledge of relevant facts (identity, substance of knowledge)
  • Expected trial witnesses and testimony subjects
  • Experts retained or consulted (identity, opinions, basis)

B. Defendant's Version of Events

  • Factual account of the incident
  • Acts or omissions attributed to plaintiff (contributory/comparative fault basis)

C. Evidence Identification

  • Documents, photos, recordings, tangible evidence related to the incident
  • Statements obtained from any person (written, recorded, oral summaries)
  • Surveillance or investigation regarding plaintiff or incident

D. Personal Injury–Specific

  • Defendant's knowledge of plaintiff's injuries
  • Insurance coverage (carrier, policy number, limits)
  • Prior similar incidents or claims involving defendant
  • Mitigation-of-damages contentions with factual basis

E. Contention Interrogatories For each affirmative defense: state every supporting fact, identify every supporting document, identify every knowledgeable person.

6. Signature Block & Certificate of Service

  • Attorney signature, date, name, bar number, firm, address, phone, email
  • Certificate of service: method, date, recipient counsel details

Pitfalls & Checks

  • Count subparts rigorously — discrete subparts count toward the cap; structure compound questions carefully
  • Tailor every set — never submit generic form interrogatories without case-specific customization
  • Proportionality — each interrogatory must satisfy FRCP 26(b)(1) relevance and proportionality
  • Avoid objection bait — do not draft overbroad, unduly burdensome, or privilege-invading questions
  • Strategic sequencing — front-load questions yielding deposition and settlement value
  • Check local rules — some jurisdictions mandate pattern interrogatories (e.g., California DISC-001) or impose different limits
  • Contention timing — some courts defer contention interrogatories to late discovery; flag for attorney review if served early