Paths: File paths (shared/, references/, ../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.

Semantic Content Auditor (L3 Worker)

Specialized worker auditing semantic accuracy of project documentation.

Purpose & Scope

• Worker in ln-610 coordinator pipeline - invoked by ln-610-docs-auditor for each project document
• Verify document content matches stated SCOPE (document purpose)
• Check content aligns with project goals (value contribution)
• Return structured findings to coordinator with severity, location, fix suggestions
• Does NOT verify facts against codebase

Target Documents

Called ONLY for project documents (not reference/tasks):

| Document | Verification Focus | |----------|-------------------| | CLAUDE.md | Instructions serve stated purpose, no off-topic content | | docs/README.md | Navigation scope correct, descriptions relevant | | docs/documentation_standards.md | Standards applicable to this project type | | docs/principles.md | Principles relevant to project architecture | | docs/project/requirements.md | Requirements scope complete, no stale items | | docs/project/architecture.md | Architecture scope covers all layers | | docs/project/tech_stack.md | Stack scope matches project reality | | docs/project/api_spec.md | API scope covers all endpoint groups | | docs/project/database_schema.md | Schema scope covers all entities | | docs/project/design_guidelines.md | Design scope covers active components | | docs/project/infrastructure.md | Infrastructure scope covers all deployment targets | | docs/project/runbook.md | Runbook scope covers setup + operations |

Excluded: docs/tasks/, docs/reference/, docs/presentation/, tests/

Inputs (from Coordinator)

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

Receives from coordinator per invocation:

| Field | Description | |-------|-------------| | doc_path | Path to document to audit (e.g., docs/project/architecture.md) | | output_dir | Directory for report output (from contextStore) | | project_root | Project root path | | tech_stack | Detected technology stack |

Workflow

Phase 1: SCOPE EXTRACTION

1. Read document first 20 lines
2. Parse <!-- SCOPE: ... --> comment
3. If no SCOPE tag, infer from document type (see Verification Rules)
4. Record stated purpose/boundaries

Phase 2: CONTENT-SCOPE ALIGNMENT

Analyze document sections against stated scope:

| Check | Finding Type | |-------|--------------| | Section not serving scope | OFF_TOPIC | | Scope aspect not covered | MISSING_COVERAGE | | Excessive detail beyond scope | SCOPE_CREEP | | Content duplicated elsewhere | SSOT_VIOLATION |

Scoring:

• 10/10: All content serves scope, scope fully covered
• 8-9/10: Minor off-topic content or small gaps
• 6-7/10: Some sections not aligned, partial coverage
• 4-5/10: Significant misalignment, major gaps
• 1-3/10: Document does not serve its stated purpose

Phase 3: SCORING & REPORT

Calculate final score based on scope alignment:

overall_score = weighted_average(coverage, relevance, focus)

Coverage: how completely the scope is addressed. Relevance: how much content serves the scope. Focus: absence of off-topic content.

Scoring Algorithm

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/references/audit_scoring.md.

Output Format

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.

Write report to {output_dir}/612-semantic-{doc-slug}.md where doc-slug is derived from document filename (e.g., architecture, tech_stack, claude_md).

With category: "Semantic Content" and checks: scope_alignment.

Return summary to coordinator:

Report written: docs/project/.audit/ln-610/{YYYY-MM-DD}/612-semantic-architecture.md
Score: X.X/10 | Issues: N (C:N H:N M:N L:N)

Critical Rules

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

• Read before judge: Always read full document before reporting issues
• Scope inference: If no SCOPE tag, use document filename to infer expected scope
• No false positives: Better to miss an issue than report incorrectly
• Location precision: Always include line number for findings
• Actionable fixes: Every finding must have concrete fix suggestion
• No fact-checking: Do NOT verify paths, versions, endpoints against code

Definition of Done

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

• Document read completely
• SCOPE extracted or inferred
• Content-scope alignment analyzed (OFF_TOPIC, MISSING_COVERAGE, SCOPE_CREEP, SSOT_VIOLATION)
• Score calculated using penalty algorithm
• Report written to {output_dir}/612-semantic-{doc-slug}.md (atomic single Write call)
• Summary returned to coordinator

Reference Files

• Audit output schema: shared/references/audit_output_schema.md

---

Version: 2.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-03-01