返回 Skill 列表
extension
分类: 开发与工程无需 API Key

mediation-arbitration-statement

草拟保密的调解或仲裁声明,向中立第三方陈述一方在事实、法律和损害赔偿方面的立场。用于准备调解简报、仲裁声明、保密立场文件或商业诉讼纠纷中的中立提交文件。

person作者: jakexiaohubgithub

Mediation / Arbitration Statement

Drafts a confidential brief for a mediator or arbitrator synthesizing facts, law, and damages into a credible, persuasive narrative.

Prerequisites

Gather before drafting:

  • Pleadings — complaint, answer, dispositive motion briefs
  • Evidence — contracts, correspondence, deposition transcripts
  • Expert reports — liability and damages opinions
  • Authorities — controlling case law, statutes, regulations
  • Prior positions — settlement demands, earlier submissions
  • Forum rules — page limits, formatting, submission guidelines

Quick Start

  1. Identify forum type (mediation vs. arbitration) — tone and strategy differ
  2. Collect all exhibits; number consecutively in order of first reference
  3. Draft using the output structure below
  4. Run the checks in Pitfalls before submission

Output Structure

1. Introduction (0.5–1 page)

| Element | Content | |---|---| | Parties | Names, roles, relationship | | Dispute | One-paragraph summary | | Procedural posture | Stage, pending motions, discovery status | | Relief sought | Specific damages figure or remedy | | Key themes | 2–3 framing themes |

2. Factual Background (3–6 pages)

  • Chronological narrative organized around claim/defense elements
  • Cite every material fact: (Ex. [#], [description]) or footnotes
  • Quote contracts, emails, testimony where impactful
  • Acknowledge undisputed facts even when unfavorable — credibility is paramount

3. Legal Analysis (3–5 pages)

Per claim or defense:

### [Claim/Defense Name]

**Governing standard**: [Rule + citation]

**Element-by-element application**:
1. [Element] — [Facts + exhibit cite]
2. [Element] — [Facts + exhibit cite]

**Opposing argument & rebuttal**: [Strongest counterargument → why it fails]
  • Bluebook citations (or forum-specified format)
  • Distinguish unfavorable authorities — do not ignore them
  • Calibrate sophistication to audience (industry arbitrator vs. judge)

4. Damages (1–3 pages)

| Category | Amount | Basis | Evidence | |---|---|---|---| | Compensatory | $X | [methodology] | Ex. [#], [expert] | | Consequential | $X | [methodology] | Ex. [#] | | Lost profits | $X | [methodology] | Ex. [#] | | Interest | $X | [rate] | [cite] | | Total | $X | | |

  • Show calculation methodology transparently with expert references
  • Address known damages challenges proactively
  • Mediation only: present ranges for speculative categories to facilitate settlement

5. Conclusion (0.5 page)

  • Reinforce 2–3 key themes
  • State relief with specificity
  • Mediation only: express good-faith willingness to negotiate; reserve specific demands for confidential mediator communications

Formatting

  • Header every page: CONFIDENTIAL — PREPARED FOR [MEDIATION/ARBITRATION] — NOT FOR FILING
  • Table of contents if >15 pages; table of authorities if >20 pages
  • Number exhibits consecutively in order of first reference
  • Conform to forum-specific formatting rules

Pitfalls

  • Overstatement — destroys credibility with neutrals; balance advocacy with candor
  • Unsupported assertions — cite everything; unsupported claims are worse than omissions
  • Privilege leaks — review for inadvertent disclosure of attorney-client or work-product material
  • FRE 408 risk — do not include content that could waive settlement-discussion protections
  • Stale citations — verify all authorities are current and not overruled
  • Protective-order material — redact anything covered by protective orders

Key changes made:

  • Description tightened — removed redundant clause about "element-driven narratives" while keeping trigger guidance
  • Added Quick Start section for immediate orientation
  • Prerequisites condensed from verbose descriptions to tight dash-separated pairs
  • Removed "Guidelines" prose — converted actionable items into a focused Pitfalls checklist
  • Formatting section trimmed — removed font/margin details (standard knowledge) and delivery format notes (operational, not drafting guidance)
  • Removed "Peer review" and "Dual format delivery" — operational steps, not skill content
  • Overall: ~105 lines → ~85 lines, cleaner progressive disclosure, all legal substance preserved

Shall I retry writing the file, or would you like to copy this content manually?