返回 Skill 列表
extension
分类: 开发与工程无需 API Key

pi-demand-summary

生成结构化的个人伤害索赔摘要,涵盖责任分析、按时间顺序记录的伤害文档、逐项损害赔偿以及和解定位。涵盖机动车事故、场所责任、产品缺陷和医疗过失索赔。在准备和解方案、索赔函、审前评估或为原告方个人伤害事务与保险理赔员谈判时使用。

person作者: jakexiaohubgithub

Personal Injury Demand Summary

Synthesizes case materials into a persuasive demand summary for settlement negotiations or internal case evaluation.

Prerequisites

Gather before starting:

  • Case file: police/incident reports, witness statements, photos, correspondence
  • Medical records: ER through current treatment, imaging, surgical notes, discharge summaries
  • Billing records: itemized medical bills from all providers
  • Wage records: pay stubs, tax returns, employer verification letters
  • Expert reports (if available): life care plans, vocational assessments, accident reconstruction
  • Insurance info: known policy limits, prior adjuster correspondence

Quick Start

Structure the demand summary in five sections:

  1. Executive Overview — incident snapshot and demand amount
  2. Liability Analysis — duty, breach, evidence, comparative fault
  3. Injury Documentation — chronological treatment narrative
  4. Damages Itemization — economic + non-economic breakdown
  5. Settlement Positioning — verdicts, risk assessment, terms

Core Workflow

1. Executive Overview

Include: incident date/location, parties, case type (MVA / premises / product defect / med mal), one-sentence liability theory, total demand amount.

2. Liability Analysis

  • [ ] Identify defendant's specific acts/omissions constituting breach
  • [ ] Cite supporting evidence: police reports, eyewitness accounts, expert opinions
  • [ ] Reference applicable legal standards (traffic laws, building codes, statutes)
  • [ ] Address and rebut comparative fault arguments
  • [ ] State liability apportionment conclusion

3. Injury Documentation (Chronological)

Organize by treatment phase:

  • Emergency/acute: date, facility, complaints, diagnoses, imaging
  • Surgical: procedures, dates, operative findings, hardware
  • Post-op/rehab: PT/OT frequency/duration, progress, functional benchmarks
  • Ongoing/maintenance: current treatment, medications, remaining complaints
  • Prognosis: MMI status, permanent impairments, future treatment needs

Distinguish objective findings (imaging, labs, surgical notes) from subjective complaints. For pre-existing conditions, delineate aggravation vs. new injury causation.

4. Damages Itemization

Economic damages — itemize each with source and amount:

  • Past medical expenses (by provider, date, amount)
  • Future medical expenses (life care plan or physician projection)
  • Past lost wages (employment records, pay period, rate)
  • Future lost earning capacity (vocational expert or wage analysis)
  • Out-of-pocket (transportation, home mods, Rx, assistive devices)

Non-economic damages — support each with specific evidence:

  • Pain and suffering (treatment intensity, duration, medication)
  • Emotional distress (mental health treatment, documented impact)
  • Loss of enjoyment of life (activities curtailed, before/after)
  • Permanent disfigurement/disability (functional limitations, rating)
  • Loss of consortium if applicable (spousal testimony, relationship impact)

Present totals: economic subtotal + non-economic subtotal = total demand.

5. Settlement Positioning

  • [ ] Cite comparable jury verdicts in the jurisdiction
  • [ ] Note policy limits considerations
  • [ ] Assess litigation risk (strengths and vulnerabilities)
  • [ ] Evaluate causation strength
  • [ ] Estimate comparative fault exposure percentage
  • [ ] Set response deadline and conditions (confidentiality, structured settlement, liens)

Pitfalls and Checks

  • Every factual assertion must trace to a specific document — cite by document name/date
  • Flag documentation gaps needing additional discovery
  • Do not fabricate medical causation — rely on treating physician opinions only
  • Note jurisdiction-specific damage caps (e.g., non-economic caps) if applicable
  • Mark unverified legal citations with [VERIFY]
  • Maintain persuasive but professional tone — specific human impact, not emotional appeals
  • Present damages credibly with negotiation room