Plan Gap Analysis

Analyze gaps between documented plans in plans/ and actual implementation.

Workflow

Phase 1: Plan Inventory

Read all plan files:

• 00-overview.md - Project summary and metrics
• 01-understand.md - Requirements and components
• 02-plan.md - Architecture decisions and roadmap
• 03-execute.md - Implementation details
• 04-review.md - Quality requirements
• 05-secure.md - Security requirements
• 06-feedback-loop.md - Refinements

Phase 2: Codebase Inventory

# List all crates
find . -name "Cargo.toml" -not -path "*/target/*"

# List source files
find . -name "*.rs" -not -path "*/target/*"

Crates to analyze:

• memory-core - Core data structures and orchestration
• memory-storage-turso - Turso/libSQL backend
• memory-storage-redb - redb cache layer
• memory-mcp - MCP server and sandbox
• test-utils - Test utilities
• benches - Performance benchmarks

Phase 3: Gap Identification

Check each phase:

| Phase | Focus Areas | |-------|-------------| | UNDERSTAND | Data structures, type definitions | | PLAN | Architectural decisions, success metrics | | EXECUTE | Storage, learning, MCP features | | REVIEW | FR1-FR7, NFR1-NFR6 tests | | SECURE | Attack surfaces, mitigations | | FEEDBACK | Edge cases, optimizations |

Phase 4: Prioritization

Critical (Blocks production):

• Security vulnerabilities
• Data corruption risks
• Missing core functionality

High (Affects quality):

• Performance targets not met
• Test coverage below target
• Missing error handling

Medium (Technical debt):

• Code quality issues
• Documentation gaps

Phase 5: TODO Generation

## Phase [N]: [NAME]

### Critical Priority
- [ ] [Component] - [Missing item]
  - File: path/to/file.rs
  - Plan: plans/0X-phase.md:LineNumber
  - Impact: [Description]
  - Effort: [Estimate]

Output Format

# Plan Gap Analysis Report
**Total Requirements**: X
**Implemented**: Y (Z%)
**Gaps Identified**: N

## By Phase
- Phase 1: X/Y complete
- Phase 2: X/Y complete
- ...

## Critical Gaps
1. [Gap] - Priority, Effort

Best Practices

✓ Be systematic: Check every requirement ✓ Be specific: Reference exact file locations ✓ Be accurate: Verify, don't assume ✓ Be prioritized: Critical > High > Medium > Low ✓ Be actionable: Include file paths and estimates