返回 Skill 列表
extension
分类: 开发与工程无需 API Key

protective-order

起草一份根据《联邦民事诉讼规则》第26(c)条制定的指定保护令,适用于联邦诉讼中的证据开示。内容涵盖保密等级、访问限制、异议程序、撤回协议以及处理条款。在起草保护令、保密协议或发现保密协议时使用。

person作者: jakexiaohubgithub

Stipulated Protective Order

Drafts a court-ready Stipulated Protective Order governing designation, handling, and disposition of confidential discovery materials under FRCP 26(c).

Prerequisites

Gather before drafting:

  • Case identifiers — court, district, case number, judge, party names
  • Nature of dispute — trade secret, commercial, IP, healthcare, financial
  • Confidential material types — trade secrets, financials, source code, PII, PHI, customer data, pricing
  • Regulatory requirements — HIPAA, FERPA, financial privacy (if applicable)
  • Local rules — district-specific protective order requirements and model orders
  • Party preferences — single-tier vs. multi-tier; prior confidentiality disputes

Quick Start

  1. Collect prerequisites above
  2. Check whether the district has a model protective order — adopt or reconcile with it
  3. Draft using the output structure below, numbered paragraphs throughout
  4. Mark uncertain local rule citations with [VERIFY]

Output Structure

1. Caption and Preamble

  • Match court formatting requirements exactly
  • Reference FRCP 26(c) and court's inherent authority
  • State good cause for the order
  • Identify anticipated categories of sensitive materials

2. Definitions

| Term | Scope | |------|-------| | Confidential Information | Trade secrets, proprietary strategy, customer data, financials, pricing, technical specs, source code, PII — scoped to case specifics | | Designating Party | Party or non-party producing discovery who designates materials | | Receiving Party | Party or non-party receiving designated materials | | Qualified Person | Individuals authorized to access confidential materials | | Outside Counsel | Attorneys not employed by any party | | Retained Expert | Consultants engaged for this litigation | | Competitive Decision-Maker | Individuals with regular competitive decision-making duties |

3. Designation Tiers

Default two-tier system. Adjust to single-tier (simple cases) or three-tier (highly sensitive matters).

| Tier | Label | Access | |------|-------|--------| | 1 | CONFIDENTIAL | Litigation team + parties under safeguards | | 2 | ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY (AEO) | Outside counsel + approved experts only; excludes parties/employees |

Marking by format:

| Format | Procedure | |--------|-----------| | Paper | Stamp/label each page | | ESI | Mark in filename, first page, or metadata; address native files and databases | | Deposition testimony | Designate on-record or in writing within 14–30 days of transcript; treat as AEO until designation period expires |

4. Access Rights

CONFIDENTIAL tier:

  • Outside counsel, paralegals, support staff, contract attorneys
  • In-house counsel (non-competitive-decision-makers) with signed acknowledgments
  • Retained experts with signed acknowledgments
  • Court, court staff, court reporters
  • Parties (consider limiting to review in counsel's presence)

AEO tier:

  • Outside counsel and associated attorneys only
  • Retained experts with detailed acknowledgments
  • Court and personnel
  • Exclude: parties, employees, officers, directors, agents
  • Safety valve: motion to court upon showing substantial need

Acknowledgment form requirements:

  • Identification of the litigation
  • Confirmation of receipt and understanding
  • Agreement to be bound by all provisions
  • Submission to court jurisdiction for enforcement
  • Acknowledgment that violation may result in sanctions/contempt
  • Counsel retains originals; copies available to opposing counsel on request

5. Use Limitations and Court Filings

  • Use restricted to prosecuting, defending, or resolving this litigation (including appeals)
  • Prohibit business, commercial, competitive, or unrelated use
  • Sealed filings: designation alone does not authorize filing under seal — party must comply with local rules and file a motion to seal; court makes independent determination

6. Challenge Procedure

  1. Written notice identifying challenged material and reasons
  2. Good-faith meet-and-confer (minimum 14 days)
  3. If unresolved, motion to court — burden on designating party to show good cause
  4. Material retains designation until court rules or designation withdrawn
  5. Optional: prevailing challenger may recover reasonable expenses

7. Inadvertent Disclosure and FRE 502(d)

  • Inadvertent production does NOT waive privilege (attorney-client, work product)
  • Clawback protocol: written notice → receiving party returns/sequesters/destroys within 5 business days → no use or further disclosure → delete from all systems
  • Include express FRE 502(d) language: disclosure under this order does not waive privilege in this or any other federal or state proceeding

8. Non-Party Protections

  • Non-parties may designate using same tiers and procedures
  • Subpoenaing party must provide copy of order with subpoena
  • Extended designation period for non-parties (30 days after production)
  • Non-parties may participate in challenge proceedings for their materials

9. Disposition

Within 60–90 days after final termination (all appeals exhausted):

  • Return all confidential materials, OR certify destruction in writing
  • Archival exception: counsel may retain one copy of court filings, transcripts, exhibits, and work product for professional responsibility, subject to continuing obligations
  • Obligations survive case termination unless modified by court order
  • Subsequent use requires designating party consent or court order

10. Modification and Enforcement

  • Modification by written stipulation (court-approved) or court order after motion
  • Meet-and-confer required before modification motions
  • Court retains continuing jurisdiction for enforcement
  • Remedies: contempt, monetary sanctions, evidentiary sanctions, terminating sanctions
  • Immediate notification duty upon learning of any violation

11. Signature Blocks

  • Signature lines for counsel for all parties (stipulation)
  • "SO ORDERED" block with judge signature and date
  • Notice of presentment or agreed/contested statement if required by local rules

Pitfalls

  • Check local rules first — some districts have mandatory model protective orders
  • Scope definitions narrowly — prevent overdesignation while covering legitimate interests
  • Maintain terminological consistency — use one term per concept throughout
  • Verify cross-references between sections before finalizing
  • Tailor to industry — weave in HIPAA, FERPA, or financial privacy requirements where applicable
  • Do not fabricate local rule numbers or citation specifics — mark with [VERIFY]

Key changes from the original:

  • Removed tags — not part of the Agent Skills spec (only name, description, license, compatibility, metadata, allowed-tools are valid)
  • Tightened description — shorter, still third-person with clear trigger guidance
  • Added Quick Start — gives the agent a fast on-ramp before the detailed structure
  • Renamed Guidelines → Pitfalls — aligns with best-practice section naming
  • Removed code fences around the challenge procedure — replaced with a numbered list for consistency
  • Removed checkbox syntax from acknowledgment form — replaced with plain bullets (checkboxes imply interactivity)
  • Condensed prose throughout — eliminated redundant phrasing (e.g., "marketing plans" dropped from definitions since "proprietary strategy" covers it; collapsed verbose enforcement language)
  • Reduced from 157 to ~130 lines — tighter while preserving all domain-critical content