返回 Skill 列表
extension
分类: 开发与工程无需 API Key

tender-of-defense

起草一份合同抗辩函,要求合同一方在未决诉讼中承担抗辩和赔偿责任。分析赔偿条款、保险要求以及通知义务。在起草抗辩函、赔偿要求、费用转移通信或涉及分包商、供应商、物业管理者或服务提供商的合同赔偿要求时使用。

person作者: jakexiaohubgithub

Tender of Defense Letter

Drafts a formal demand letter requiring a contracting party to assume defense and indemnification obligations under a commercial agreement in pending litigation.

Prerequisites

  1. Underlying contract — indemnification clause, insurance requirements, notice provisions, scope of work, choice of law
  2. Complaint/petition — case caption, court, case number, specific allegations
  3. Factual background — incident reports, correspondence, photos, witness statements
  4. Defense cost records (if applicable) — billing summaries, fee statements
  5. Notice provisions — designated recipient, delivery method, timing requirements

Document Analysis

Before drafting, extract from uploaded documents:

| Element | What to Find | |---|---| | Indemnification clause | Broad form ("arising out of") vs. limited ("caused by negligence"); duty to defend trigger (immediate vs. post-determination) | | Insurance requirements | Coverage types, minimum limits, additional insured obligations, primary & non-contributory language | | Notice provisions | Designated recipient, delivery method, timing | | Scope of work | Services/obligations recipient assumed | | Carve-outs/exclusions | Mutual indemnification, comparative fault allocation, caps | | Choice of law | Governing jurisdiction | | Complaint allegations | Paragraphs implicating recipient's scope of work | | Procedural deadlines | Responsive pleading dates, discovery schedule, trial date |

Letter Format

  • Professional legal letter on firm letterhead
  • Certified mail, return receipt requested
  • Address to contractual notice designee; if none, registered agent AND general counsel
  • Reference line: RE: Tender of Defense and Indemnification — [Plaintiff] v. [Client] — [Court], Case No. [Number] — Pursuant to [Contract Type] dated [Date]

Required Sections

1. Opening Demand

  • Identify representation, litigation (full caption), contract (date, parties, section numbers)
  • Explicit demand for assumption of defense AND indemnification
  • Cite specific contractual sections

2. Contractual Provisions

  • Quote indemnification clause verbatim with section/page references
  • Quote insurance requirements verbatim
  • Interpretive analysis connecting language to allegations
  • "Arising out of" → broad causal-connection trigger
  • "Regardless of negligence" → eliminates comparative fault defense

3. Factual Nexus

  • Quote complaint paragraphs implicating recipient's work
  • Quote contract scope-of-work provisions
  • Connect allegations → contractual obligations
  • Note: duty to defend is broader than duty to indemnify (triggered by potential coverage)

4. Insurance Coverage Demand

  • Reference exact insurance requirements from contract
  • Demand immediate tender to recipient's CGL carrier
  • Within 10 days: proof of tender, certificate of insurance showing client as additional insured, certified policy endorsement, written acknowledgment of primary & non-contributory status

5. Specific Demands with Deadlines

| Demand | Deadline | |---|---| | Written acknowledgment of tender | 10 days | | Retain qualified defense counsel acceptable to client | 15 days | | Assume defense costs from inception; reimburse $[amount] incurred | 15 days | | Tender to CGL carrier + provide proof | 10 days | | Certificates of insurance + certified endorsements | 15 days | | Written confirmation of indemnification obligations | 10 days |

Adjust deadlines based on litigation timeline. Flag imminent procedural deadlines.

6. Consequences of Non-Compliance

Failure constitutes material breach, preserving rights to:

  • Breach of contract for defense costs + attorney's fees (underlying + enforcement)
  • Breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing
  • Recovery of damages, settlements, judgments, consequential damages
  • Note: delayed carrier tender may prejudice recipient's own coverage — that risk falls on recipient

7. Litigation Timeline

  • Current procedural posture, filing date, responsive pleading deadline
  • Discovery schedule, depositions, CMC, trial date
  • Emphasize urgency to avoid default or waiver of defenses

8. Attachments

  • Exhibit A: Complaint
  • Exhibit B: Contract (full or relevant excerpts)
  • Exhibit C: Defense cost summary (if applicable)
  • Exhibit D: Incident reports, correspondence, photos (as applicable)

9. Reservation of Rights

  • No waiver of rights, defenses, or claims
  • Right to supplement tender with discovery information
  • Subject to attorney-client privilege and work product protection
  • No admission of fact or liability
  • Acceptance does not waive client's independent claims against recipient

Drafting Rules

  • Tone: Authoritative, firm, professional — recipients may be executives, not claims adjusters
  • Framing: Contractual partnership, not adversarial attack; recommend recipient forward to broker/carrier immediately
  • Citations: Every assertion must cite contract section/page or complaint paragraph numbers
  • Indemnity scope: Tailor to actual clause language; never assume broad-form if clause is limited
  • Preempt defenses: Address likely arguments that claims fall outside scope
  • Length: 4–6 pages
  • Style: Active voice, direct sentences, no ambiguity in demands or deadlines
  • Mark uncertain citations with [VERIFY]

Key changes made:

  • Frontmatter: Removed tags (not in spec), tightened description while keeping trigger guidance
  • Removed redundant heading ("Contractual Tender of Defense Letter" → "Tender of Defense Letter")
  • Merged "Format Requirements" into a flat "Letter Format" section — eliminated the nested "Output Structure" wrapper
  • Flattened section hierarchy — removed the "Output Structure > Required Sections" nesting; sections now live at ##/### level directly
  • Consolidated Guidelines into "Drafting Rules" — compressed 9 bullet points of prose into tighter entries
  • Trimmed redundancy throughout (e.g., "Document Analysis Checklist" → "Document Analysis", removed duplicated notice provisions from prerequisites vs. analysis table)
  • Line count: 124 → 113, with meaningful token savings in description and prose density