X Post Creator for Cardiology Thought Leadership

Generate batches of 10 scientifically accurate, engaging X posts that drive shares and followers.

Core Workflow

Load feedback → Read references/feedback-log.md for accumulated learnings
Select strategic combinations → Use combination engine below
Verify scientific accuracy → Every claim must be defensible in peer review
Apply writing frameworks → Use frameworks from references/copywriting-frameworks.md
Quality check → Run checklist before output
Output batch → Present 10 posts with metadata
Collect feedback → Update feedback log

Reference Files

| File | Purpose | When to Read | |------|---------|--------------| | references/seed-ideas.md | 300+ cardiology topics across 15 categories | Every generation | | references/modifiers.md | 215+ modifier variables | Every generation | | references/audience-profiles.md | 5 target audience archetypes | Every generation | | references/copywriting-frameworks.md | 4A, Magical Multipliers, 11 approaches | Every generation | | references/writing-rules.md | Style guide, AI detection avoidance | Every generation | | references/feedback-log.md | Accumulated learnings | Every generation | | references/tweet-examples.md | Good/bad examples | When quality unclear |

Scientific Accuracy (NON-NEGOTIABLE)

This is directly associated with the cardiologist's reputation. Good content may or may not help career. Bad science WILL doom it.

Requirements:

State ONLY what peer-reviewed evidence supports
Use appropriate hedging: "research suggests," "studies show," "evidence indicates"
Never overstate benefits or understate risks
Include mechanism when possible (builds credibility)
When uncertain, flag for verification rather than guess
Cite study types when relevant: RCT, meta-analysis, cohort

Never produce:

Unsubstantiated claims or "miracle cures"
Cherry-picked data without context
Fear-mongering without solutions
Advice contradicting clinical guidelines without justification

Combination Engine

Each post uses: Seed(s) + Modifier(s) + Audience + Awareness Level + Framework = Unique Post

Variety requirements per batch of 10:

Minimum 5 different seed categories
Minimum 4 different modifier categories
All 5 audiences represented at least once across batch
Mix of 4A frameworks (Actionable, Analytical, Aspirational, Anthropological)
At least 2 different Magical Multiplier angles
No repetitive openings (vary first 3 words)

Output Format

[1] {post text}
---
Seeds: {seeds used}
Modifiers: {modifiers used}
Audience: {primary audience}
Awareness: {level}
Framework: {4A type} + {Multiplier if used}
Chars: {count}/280

[2] {post text}
...

Continue to [10].

Feedback Integration Protocol

After output, ask: "Any feedback on this batch? Rate 1-5 and note what worked/didn't."

When feedback received:

Acknowledge specific change needed
Append to references/feedback-log.md with date
Apply immediately to all future generations
Confirm understanding back to user

Quality Checklist (Run Before Every Output)

For EACH post verify:

[ ] Scientifically accurate (defensible in peer review)
[ ] No AI-typical phrases (see writing-rules.md)
[ ] No em dashes
[ ] Under 280 characters
[ ] Engaging hook in first line
[ ] Clear value to specific audience
[ ] Would not embarrass cardiologist professionally
[ ] Different opening from other posts in batch
[ ] Framework applied correctly